[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][tosa] Work around GCC bug in tosa-to-tensor (PR #91521)
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed May 8 12:11:55 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: Spenser Bauman (sabauma)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
GCC 12 and 13 generate incorrect code for a pattern in the tosa-to-tensor pass responsible for lowering tosa.reshape. This results in the tosa.reshape lowering producing IR which fails to verify. I've narrowed down the set of cmake flags needed to reproduce the issue to this:
cmake -G Ninja ../llvm \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="mlir" \
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=host \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=mlir \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" \
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O2" \
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-O2" \
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++ \
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc
This is the failing test case:
func.func @<!-- -->fails_in_gcc_12(%arg0: tensor<?xf32>) -> tensor<1x1x1x?xf32> {
%0 = tosa.reshape %arg0 {new_shape = array<i64: 1, 1, 1, -1>} : (tensor<?xf32>) -> tensor<1x1x1x?xf32>
return %0 : tensor<1x1x1x?xf32>
}
This should lower to a tensor.expand_shape operation like so:
func.func @<!-- -->foo(%arg0: tensor<?xf32>) -> tensor<1x1x1x?xf32> {
%c0 = arith.constant 0 : index
%dim = tensor.dim %arg0, %c0 : tensor<?xf32>
%c1 = arith.constant 1 : index
%expanded = tensor.expand_shape %arg0 [[0, 1, 2, 3]] output_shape [1, 1, 1, %dim] : tensor<?xf32> into tensor<1x1x1x?xf32>
return %expanded : tensor<1x1x1x?xf32>
}
Under GCC 12/13 with the above cmake configuration, the tensor.expand_shape looks like this
%2 = "tensor.expand_shape"(%arg0) <{reassociation = [[0, 1, 2, 3]], static_output_shape = array<i64>}> : (tensor<?xf32>) -> tensor<?x1x1x?xf32>
The key difference is the computed output type of `tensor<?x1x1x?xf32>` rather than the expected `tensor<1x1x1x?xf32>`. This expand_shape fails to verify with this error message:
error: 'tensor.expand_shape' op expected number of static shape dims to be equal to the output rank (4) but found 0 inputs instead
The problematic code is calculating the intermediate shape of the generated tensor.expand_shape operation in the
expand_shape/collapse_shape sequence that implements tosa.reshape.
// Compute result shape
bool resultIsStatic = true;
auto resultShape = llvm::map_to_vector(newShape, [&](int64_t size) {
// Omitted
// If we do not know the total size of the tensor, keep this dimension
// dynamic in the result shape.
if (!inputIsStatic) {
resultIsStatic = false;
return ShapedType::kDynamic;
}
});
if (resultIsStatic) {
// do something
return;
}
// do something else
return;
The failure point seems to be the update of the resultIsStatic variable in the lambda body. The assignment of false is not propagated to the use in the if-statement, resulting in the branch being taken when it should not.
I've found several modification to the code that gets around the bug. The version I settled on is one which makes the logic a little more obvious.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91521.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) mlir/lib/Conversion/TosaToTensor/TosaToTensor.cpp (+1)
``````````diff
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Conversion/TosaToTensor/TosaToTensor.cpp b/mlir/lib/Conversion/TosaToTensor/TosaToTensor.cpp
index cd6da35582469..488c24e90f5a0 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Conversion/TosaToTensor/TosaToTensor.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Conversion/TosaToTensor/TosaToTensor.cpp
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ TensorType inferReshapeExpandedType(TensorType inputType,
return totalSize / totalSizeNoPlaceholder;
});
+
// A syntactic restriction in 'tensor.expand_shape' forbids a dynamically
// shaped input from being reshaped into a statically shaped result. We may
// simply turn the first result dimension dynamic to address this.
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91521
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list