[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [SCF][Transform] Add support for scf.for in LoopFuseSibling op (PR #81495)

[Rolf Morel]

================
@@ -119,3 +119,184 @@ module attributes {transform.with_named_sequence} {
     transform.yield
   }
 }
+
+// -----
+
+// CHECK: func.func @test([[A:%.*]]: {{.*}}, [[B1:%.*]]: {{.*}}, [[B2:%.*]]: {{.*}} {{.*}}
+func.func @test(%A : tensor<128x128xf32>, %B1 : tensor<128x128xf32>, %B2 : tensor<128x128xf32>) -> (tensor<128x128xf32>, tensor<128x128xf32>) {
+  %zero = arith.constant 0.0 : f32
+  %out_alloc = tensor.empty() : tensor<128x128xf32>
+  %out = linalg.fill ins(%zero : f32) outs(%out_alloc : tensor<128x128xf32>) -> tensor<128x128xf32>
+
+  // CHECK-DAG: [[C0:%.*]] = arith.constant 0 : index
+  // CHECK-DAG: [[C32:%.*]] = arith.constant 32 : index
+  // CHECK-DAG: [[C128:%.*]] = arith.constant 128 : index
+  // CHECK-DAG: [[ZERO:%.*]] = arith.constant 0.000000e+00 : f32
+  // CHECK-DAG: [[EMPTY:%.*]] = tensor.empty() : tensor<128x128xf32>
+  // CHECK-DAG: [[BUF:%.*]] = linalg.fill ins([[ZERO]] : {{.*}}) outs([[EMPTY]] : {{.*}}) {{.*}}
+  // CHECK: [[RST:%.*]]:2 = scf.for [[IV:%.*]] = [[C0]] to [[C128]] step [[C32]] iter_args([[IA0:%.*]] = [[BUF]], [[IA1:%.*]] = [[BUF]]) {{.*}}
+  // CHECK-DAG:   [[ASLICE:%.*]] = tensor.extract_slice [[A]][[[IV]], 0] [32, 128] [1, 1]
+  // CHECK-DAG:   [[SLICE0:%.*]] = tensor.extract_slice [[IA0]][[[IV]], 0] [32, 128] [1, 1]
+  // CHECK:       [[OUT1:%.*]] = linalg.matmul ins([[ASLICE]], [[B1]] : {{.*}}) outs([[SLICE0]]
+  // CHECK-NEXT:  [[INS0:%.*]] = tensor.insert_slice [[OUT1]] into [[IA0]][[[IV]], 0] [32, 128] [1, 1]
+  // CHECK-DAG:   [[SLICE1:%.*]] = tensor.extract_slice [[IA1]][[[IV]], 0] [32, 128] [1, 1]
+  // CHECK:       [[OUT2:%.*]] = linalg.matmul ins([[ASLICE]], [[B2]] : {{.*}}) outs([[SLICE1]]
+  // CHECK-NEXT:  [[INS1:%.*]] = tensor.insert_slice [[OUT2]] into [[IA1]][[[IV]], 0] [32, 128] [1, 1]
+  // CHECK: scf.yield [[INS0]], [[INS1]] : {{.*}}
+  %out1 = linalg.matmul ins(%A, %B1 : tensor<128x128xf32>, tensor<128x128xf32>) outs(%out : tensor<128x128xf32>) -> tensor<128x128xf32>
+  %out2 = linalg.matmul ins(%A, %B2 : tensor<128x128xf32>, tensor<128x128xf32>) outs(%out : tensor<128x128xf32>) -> tensor<128x128xf32>
+
+  // CHECK: return [[RST]]#0, [[RST]]#1 : {{.*}}
+  func.return %out1, %out2 : tensor<128x128xf32>, tensor<128x128xf32>
+}
+
+module attributes {transform.with_named_sequence} {
+  transform.named_sequence @__transform_main(%variant_op : !transform.any_op {transform.readonly}) {
+    %matched = transform.structured.match ops{["linalg.matmul"]} in %variant_op : (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op)
+
+    %mm1, %mm2 = transform.split_handle %matched : (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
+
+    %tiled_mm1, %loop1 = transform.structured.tile_using_for %mm1 [32] : (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
+    %tiled_mm2, %loop2 = transform.structured.tile_using_for %mm2 [32] : (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
+    //transform.print %variant_op : !transform.any_op
+
+    %func = transform.structured.match ops{["func.func"]} in %variant_op : (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op)
+    %cse_func = transform.apply_registered_pass "cse" to %func : (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op)
+    %for_loops = transform.structured.match ops{["scf.for"]} in %cse_func : (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op)
+    %for_loop1, %for_loop2 = transform.split_handle %for_loops : (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
+    %fused_loop = transform.loop.fuse_sibling %for_loop2 into %for_loop1 : (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op) -> !transform.any_op
----------------
rolfmorel wrote:

Agreed. Have simplified the tests so that they are proper _unit_ tests.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81495