[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][emitc] Fix form-expressions inside expression (PR #86081)
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Mar 20 21:37:25 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir
Author: Kirill Chibisov (kchibisov)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
Make form-expressions not create `emitc.expression`s for operations inside the `emitc.expression`s, since they are invalid.
--
I've discovered it when I wanted to run this pass after some other transformation I perform, so I don't have to re-implement it inside my own pass, however given that I have `emitc.expression` inside the input, it was producing invalid IR.
Not sure whether it's the right way to fix it.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86081.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) mlir/lib/Dialect/EmitC/Transforms/FormExpressions.cpp (+2-1)
- (modified) mlir/test/Dialect/EmitC/transforms.mlir (+17)
``````````diff
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/EmitC/Transforms/FormExpressions.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/EmitC/Transforms/FormExpressions.cpp
index 5b03f81b305fd5..e7c431f39e3f08 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/EmitC/Transforms/FormExpressions.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/EmitC/Transforms/FormExpressions.cpp
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ struct FormExpressionsPass
// Wrap each C operator op with an expression op.
OpBuilder builder(context);
auto matchFun = [&](Operation *op) {
- if (op->hasTrait<OpTrait::emitc::CExpression>())
+ if (op->hasTrait<OpTrait::emitc::CExpression>() &&
+ !op->getParentOfType<emitc::ExpressionOp>())
createExpression(op, builder);
};
rootOp->walk(matchFun);
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/EmitC/transforms.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/EmitC/transforms.mlir
index ad167fa455a1a5..30551f09fd4da8 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/EmitC/transforms.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/EmitC/transforms.mlir
@@ -107,3 +107,20 @@ func.func @expression_with_address_taken(%arg0: i32, %arg1: i32, %arg2: !emitc.p
%d = emitc.cmp lt, %c, %arg2 :(!emitc.ptr<i32>, !emitc.ptr<i32>) -> i1
return %d : i1
}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: func.func @no_expression_in_expression(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[VAL_0:.*]]: i32, %[[VAL_1:.*]]: i32) -> i1 {
+// CHECK: %[[VAL_2:.*]] = emitc.expression : i1 {
+// CHECK: %[[VAL_3:.*]] = emitc.cmp lt, %[[VAL_0]], %[[VAL_1]] : (i32, i32) -> i1
+// CHECK: emitc.yield %[[VAL_3]] : i1
+// CHECK: }
+// CHECK: return %[[VAL_2]] : i1
+// CHECK: }
+
+func.func @no_expression_in_expression(%arg0: i32, %arg1: i32) -> i1 {
+ %a = emitc.expression : i1 {
+ %b = emitc.cmp lt, %arg0, %arg1 :(i32, i32) -> i1
+ emitc.yield %b : i1
+ }
+ return %a : i1
+}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86081
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list