[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][scf] Implement conversion from scf.forall to scf.parallel (PR #94109)
Spenser Bauman
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Mon Jun 3 05:36:35 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+//===- ForallToParallel.cpp - scf.forall to scf.parallel loop conversion --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Transforms SCF.ForallOp's into SCF.ParallelOps's.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "mlir/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.h"
+#include "mlir/Dialect/SCF/Transforms/Passes.h"
+#include "mlir/Dialect/SCF/Transforms/Transforms.h"
+#include "mlir/IR/PatternMatch.h"
+
+namespace mlir {
+#define GEN_PASS_DEF_SCFFORALLTOPARALLELLOOP
+#include "mlir/Dialect/SCF/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
+} // namespace mlir
+
+using namespace mlir;
+
+LogicalResult mlir::scf::forallToParallelLoop(RewriterBase &rewriter,
----------------
sabauma wrote:
I had a look through the other `SCF->*` conversions to see if the `mapping` attribute was used anywhere. The `SCF->GPU` conversion specifically looks for the `mapping` attribute.
I think preserving the attribute is reasonable, though maybe the scf.parallel definition should be modified to make it an official argument.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94109
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list