[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir] Add direct vectorization lowering for `tensor.pack` ops (PR #78660)

Diego Caballero llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Jan 31 17:26:35 PST 2024


dcaballe wrote:

What is the plan for this then? IIRC we needed direct vectorization here not only for performance but also because the vector code for this op was canonicalized away and we ended up with scalar data copies. It would be great to have some clarity as @bviyer also has the unpack counterpart here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76087

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78660


More information about the Mlir-commits mailing list