[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir] Add direct vectorization lowering for `tensor.pack` ops (PR #78660)
Diego Caballero
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Jan 31 17:26:35 PST 2024
dcaballe wrote:
What is the plan for this then? IIRC we needed direct vectorization here not only for performance but also because the vector code for this op was canonicalized away and we ended up with scalar data copies. It would be great to have some clarity as @bviyer also has the unpack counterpart here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76087
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78660
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list