[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][ArmSME] Support 2-way widening outer products (PR #78975)
Benjamin Maxwell
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Thu Jan 25 10:11:36 PST 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+//===- OuterProductWidening.cpp - Widen 'arm_sme.outerproduct' ops --------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file implements rewrites that fold 'arm_sme.outerproduct' operations
+// into the 2-way or 4-way widening outerproduct operations.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "mlir/Dialect/ArmSME/IR/ArmSME.h"
+#include "mlir/Dialect/ArmSME/Transforms/Passes.h"
+#include "mlir/Dialect/ArmSME/Transforms/Transforms.h"
+#include "mlir/Dialect/ArmSVE/IR/ArmSVEDialect.h"
+#include "mlir/Dialect/Func/IR/FuncOps.h"
+#include "mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMDialect.h"
+#include "mlir/IR/PatternMatch.h"
+#include "mlir/Transforms/GreedyPatternRewriteDriver.h"
+
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "arm-sme-outerproduct-widening"
+
+namespace mlir::arm_sme {
+#define GEN_PASS_DEF_OUTERPRODUCTWIDENING
+#include "mlir/Dialect/ArmSME/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
+} // namespace mlir::arm_sme
+
+using namespace mlir;
+using namespace mlir::arm_sme;
+
+namespace {
+// Fold two 'arm_sme.outerproduct' operations that are chained via the
+// accumulator into 2-way outer product operation.
+//
+// For example:
+//
+// %a0_ext = arith.extf %a0 : vector<[4]xf16> to vector<[4]xf32>
+// %b0_ext = arith.extf %b0 : vector<[4]xf16> to vector<[4]xf32>
+// %0 = arm_sme.outerproduct %a0_ext, %b0_ext : vector<[4]xf32>,
+// vector<[4]xf32>
+//
+// %a1_ext = arith.extf %a1 : vector<[4]xf16> to vector<[4]xf32>
+// %b1_ext = arith.extf %b1 : vector<[4]xf16> to vector<[4]xf32>
+// %1 = arm_sme.outerproduct %a1_ext, %b1_ext, %0 : vector<[4]xf32>,
+// vector<[4]xf32>
+//
+// Becomes:
+//
+// %a_packed = arm_sve.zip %a0, %a1 : vector<[8]xf16> to vector<[8]xf16>
+// %b_packed = arm_sve.zip %b0, %b1 : vector<[8]xf16> to vector<[8]xf16>
+// %0 = arm_sme.fmopa_wide_2way %a_packed, %b_packed : vector<[8]xf16>,
+// vector<[4]xf32>
+class OuterProduct2WayWidening
+ : public OpRewritePattern<arm_sme::OuterProductOp> {
+public:
+ using OpRewritePattern::OpRewritePattern;
+
+ LogicalResult matchAndRewrite(arm_sme::OuterProductOp op,
+ PatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+ Value acc = op.getAcc();
+ if (!acc)
+ return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(op, "no accumulator operand");
+
+ arm_sme::OuterProductOp op1 = acc.getDefiningOp<arm_sme::OuterProductOp>();
+ arm_sme::OuterProductOp op2 = op;
+ if (!op1)
+ return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(op,
+ "defining op of accumulator operand "
+ "must be an 'arm_sme.outerproduct'");
+
+ if (op1.getKind() != op2.getKind())
+ return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+ op, "combining kind (add or sub) of outer products must match");
+
+ if (!llvm::hasSingleElement(op1->getUses())) {
+ // We could still widen, but if the first outer product has an
+ // accumulator it will be used as the root for tile allocation and since
+ // the widening outer product uses the same accumulator it will get
+ // assigned the same tile ID, resulting in 3 outer products and incorrect
+ // results. No accumulator would be ok, but it's simpler to prevent this
+ // altogether, since it has no benefit.
+ return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+ op, "first outer product is not single use and cannot be removed, "
+ "no benefit to widening");
+ }
+
+ auto nxnxv4i32 =
+ VectorType::get({4, 4}, rewriter.getI32Type(), {true, true});
+ auto nxnxv4f32 =
+ VectorType::get({4, 4}, rewriter.getF32Type(), {true, true});
+ auto nxv4i16 = VectorType::get({4}, rewriter.getI16Type(), true);
+ auto nxv4f16 = VectorType::get({4}, rewriter.getF16Type(), true);
+ auto nxv4bf16 = VectorType::get({4}, rewriter.getBF16Type(), true);
+ if ((failed(
+ isWidenable<arith::ExtFOp>(rewriter, op1, nxnxv4f32, nxv4f16)) ||
+ failed(
+ isWidenable<arith::ExtFOp>(rewriter, op2, nxnxv4f32, nxv4f16))) &&
+ (failed(
+ isWidenable<arith::ExtFOp>(rewriter, op1, nxnxv4f32, nxv4bf16)) ||
+ failed(
+ isWidenable<arith::ExtFOp>(rewriter, op2, nxnxv4f32, nxv4bf16))) &&
+ (failed(
+ isWidenable<arith::ExtSIOp>(rewriter, op1, nxnxv4i32, nxv4i16)) ||
+ failed(
+ isWidenable<arith::ExtSIOp>(rewriter, op2, nxnxv4i32, nxv4i16))) &&
+ (failed(
+ isWidenable<arith::ExtUIOp>(rewriter, op1, nxnxv4i32, nxv4i16)) ||
+ failed(
+ isWidenable<arith::ExtUIOp>(rewriter, op2, nxnxv4i32, nxv4i16))))
+ return failure();
+
+ auto loc = op.getLoc();
+
+ // zip(lhs, rhs)
+ auto packInputs = [&](VectorType type, Value lhs, Value rhs) {
+ auto undef = rewriter.create<LLVM::UndefOp>(loc, type);
+ auto insertLHS =
+ rewriter.create<vector::ScalableInsertOp>(loc, lhs, undef, 0);
+ auto insertRHS =
+ rewriter.create<vector::ScalableInsertOp>(loc, rhs, undef, 0);
+ return rewriter.create<arm_sve::Zip1IntrOp>(loc, type, insertLHS,
+ insertRHS);
+ };
+
+ auto extOp = op.getLhs().getDefiningOp();
+ VectorType extSourceVectorType =
+ cast<VectorType>(extOp->getOperand(0).getType());
+ VectorType widenedVectorType =
+ VectorType::Builder(extSourceVectorType)
+ .setDim(0, extSourceVectorType.getShape()[0] * 2);
+ auto lhs = packInputs(widenedVectorType,
+ op1.getLhs().getDefiningOp()->getOperand(0),
+ op2.getLhs().getDefiningOp()->getOperand(0));
+ auto rhs = packInputs(widenedVectorType,
+ op1.getRhs().getDefiningOp()->getOperand(0),
+ op2.getRhs().getDefiningOp()->getOperand(0));
+
+ Value lhsMask, rhsMask;
+ if (op1.getLhsMask() || op2.getLhsMask()) {
+ if (!(op1.getLhsMask() && op2.getLhsMask()))
+ return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+ op, "unsupported masking, either both outerproducts are masked "
+ "or neither");
+
+ VectorType maskType = VectorType::Builder(widenedVectorType)
+ .setElementType(rewriter.getI1Type());
+ lhsMask = packInputs(maskType, op1.getLhsMask(), op2.getLhsMask());
+ rhsMask = packInputs(maskType, op1.getRhsMask(), op2.getRhsMask());
+ }
+
+ arm_sme::CombiningKind kind = op.getKind();
+ assert((kind == arm_sme::CombiningKind::Add ||
+ kind == arm_sme::CombiningKind::Sub) &&
+ "unhandled arm_sme::CombiningKind!");
+
+ if (isa<arith::ExtFOp>(extOp)) {
+ if (kind == arm_sme::CombiningKind::Add)
+ rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<arm_sme::FMopaWide2WayOp>(
+ op2, op.getResultType(), lhs, rhs, lhsMask, rhsMask, op1.getAcc());
+ else
+ rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<arm_sme::FMopsWide2WayOp>(
+ op2, op.getResultType(), lhs, rhs, lhsMask, rhsMask, op1.getAcc());
+ } else if (isa<arith::ExtSIOp>(extOp)) {
+ if (kind == arm_sme::CombiningKind::Add)
+ rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<arm_sme::SMopaWide2WayOp>(
+ op2, op.getResultType(), lhs, rhs, lhsMask, rhsMask, op1.getAcc());
+ else
+ rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<arm_sme::SMopsWide2WayOp>(
+ op2, op.getResultType(), lhs, rhs, lhsMask, rhsMask, op1.getAcc());
+ } else if (isa<arith::ExtUIOp>(extOp)) {
+ if (kind == arm_sme::CombiningKind::Add)
+ rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<arm_sme::UMopaWide2WayOp>(
+ op2, op.getResultType(), lhs, rhs, lhsMask, rhsMask, op1.getAcc());
+ else
+ rewriter.replaceOpWithNewOp<arm_sme::UMopsWide2WayOp>(
+ op2, op.getResultType(), lhs, rhs, lhsMask, rhsMask, op1.getAcc());
+ } else
+ llvm_unreachable("unexpected extend op!");
----------------
MacDue wrote:
nt: I think it looks odd having a dangling else when the other conditions are in braces.
```suggestion
} else {
llvm_unreachable("unexpected extend op!");
}
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78975
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list