[Mlir-commits] [flang] [openmp] [mlir] [Flang][OpenMP] Initial mapping of Fortran pointers and allocatables for target devices (PR #71766)

[llvmlistbot at llvm.org]

================
@@ -2094,3 +2094,17 @@ func.func @omp_target_update_data (%if_cond : i1, %device : si32, %map1: memref<
     return
 }
 
+// CHECK-LABEL: omp_targets_is_allocatable
+// CHECK-SAME: (%[[ARG0:.*]]: !llvm.ptr, %[[ARG1:.*]]: !llvm.ptr)
+func.func @omp_targets_is_allocatable(%arg0: !llvm.ptr, %arg1: !llvm.ptr) -> () {
+  // CHECK: %[[MAP0:.*]] = omp.map_info var_ptr(%[[ARG0]] : !llvm.ptr, !llvm.struct<(ptr, i64, i32, i8, i8, i8, i8)>) map_clauses(tofrom) capture(ByRef) -> !llvm.ptr {is_fortran_allocatable, name = ""}
+  %mapv1 = omp.map_info var_ptr(%arg0 : !llvm.ptr, !llvm.struct<(ptr, i64, i32, i8, i8, i8, i8)>)   map_clauses(tofrom) capture(ByRef) -> !llvm.ptr {is_fortran_allocatable, name = ""}
+  // CHECK: %[[MAP1:.*]] = omp.map_info var_ptr(%[[ARG1]] : !llvm.ptr, !llvm.array<10 x i32>) map_clauses(to) capture(ByCopy) -> !llvm.ptr {name = ""}
+  %mapv2 = omp.map_info var_ptr(%arg1 : !llvm.ptr, !llvm.array<10 x i32>) map_clauses(to) capture(ByCopy) -> !llvm.ptr {name = ""}
+  // CHECK: omp.target map_entries(%[[MAP0]] -> {{.*}}, %[[MAP1]] -> {{.*}} : !llvm.ptr, !llvm.ptr)
+  omp.target map_entries(%mapv1 -> %arg2, %mapv2 -> %arg3 : !llvm.ptr, !llvm.ptr) {
+    ^bb0(%arg2: !llvm.ptr, %arg3 : !llvm.ptr):
+      omp.terminator
+  }
+  return
+}
----------------
agozillon wrote:

Thank you for the catch! Yes, this test seems to have missed a few updates and seems to be testing old behavior..

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71766