[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][gpu] Improve `gpu-lower-to-nvvm-pipeline` Documentation (PR #77062)

[Mehdi Amini]

joker-eph wrote:

> The pipeline requires explicitly parallel IR and doesn't do parallelism to any of the operations especially for linalg. Does this explanation align with our goals?

I would think that "gpu" is already parallel code (the pipeline is "gpu-to-nvvm" here): so it seems to me that handling of linalg should be done outside of this pipeline  and this pipeline invoked on the results.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77062