[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir] introduce transform.collect_matching (PR #76724)
Oleksandr Alex Zinenko
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Jan 3 02:50:17 PST 2024
================
@@ -822,6 +823,137 @@ matchBlock(Block &block, Operation *op, transform::TransformState &state,
return DiagnosedSilenceableFailure::success();
}
+/// Returns `true` if both types implement one of the interfaces provided as
+/// template parameters.
+template <typename... Tys>
+static bool implementSameInterface(Type t1, Type t2) {
+ return ((isa<Tys>(t1) && isa<Tys>(t2)) || ... || false);
+}
+
+/// Returns `true` if both types implement one of the transform dialect
+/// interfaces.
+static bool implementSameTransformInterface(Type t1, Type t2) {
+ return implementSameInterface<transform::TransformHandleTypeInterface,
+ transform::TransformParamTypeInterface,
+ transform::TransformValueHandleTypeInterface>(
+ t1, t2);
+}
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// CollectMatchingOp
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+DiagnosedSilenceableFailure
+transform::CollectMatchingOp::apply(transform::TransformRewriter &rewriter,
+ transform::TransformResults &results,
+ transform::TransformState &state) {
+ auto matcher = SymbolTable::lookupNearestSymbolFrom<FunctionOpInterface>(
+ getOperation(), getMatcher());
+ if (matcher.isExternal()) {
+ return emitDefiniteFailure()
----------------
ftynse wrote:
No, at verification time we allow external symbols. They may be "resolved" later by merging modules or by providing a library module to the interpreter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76724
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list