[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir] introduce transform.collect_matching (PR #76724)

[Matthias Springer]

================
@@ -822,6 +823,137 @@ matchBlock(Block &block, Operation *op, transform::TransformState &state,
   return DiagnosedSilenceableFailure::success();
 }
 
+/// Returns `true` if both types implement one of the interfaces provided as
+/// template parameters.
+template <typename... Tys>
+static bool implementSameInterface(Type t1, Type t2) {
+  return ((isa<Tys>(t1) && isa<Tys>(t2)) || ... || false);
+}
+
+/// Returns `true` if both types implement one of the transform dialect
+/// interfaces.
+static bool implementSameTransformInterface(Type t1, Type t2) {
+  return implementSameInterface<transform::TransformHandleTypeInterface,
+                                transform::TransformParamTypeInterface,
+                                transform::TransformValueHandleTypeInterface>(
+      t1, t2);
+}
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// CollectMatchingOp
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+DiagnosedSilenceableFailure
+transform::CollectMatchingOp::apply(transform::TransformRewriter &rewriter,
+                                    transform::TransformResults &results,
+                                    transform::TransformState &state) {
+  auto matcher = SymbolTable::lookupNearestSymbolFrom<FunctionOpInterface>(
+      getOperation(), getMatcher());
+  if (matcher.isExternal()) {
+    return emitDefiniteFailure()
----------------
matthias-springer wrote:

Could this be verified in the op verifier?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76724