[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR] Add XeGPU dialect for Intel GPU (PR #78483)

[Chao Chen]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+//===- XeGPU.h - MLIR dialect for XeGPU -------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef MLIR_DIALECT_XEGPU_IR_XEGPU_H
+#define MLIR_DIALECT_XEGPU_IR_XEGPU_H
+
+#include <mlir/IR/BuiltinTypes.h>
+#include <mlir/IR/Dialect.h>
+#include <mlir/IR/OpDefinition.h>
+#include <mlir/IR/Region.h>
+#include <mlir/IR/Types.h>
+#include <mlir/Interfaces/CastInterfaces.h>
+#include <mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h>
+#include <mlir/Interfaces/CopyOpInterface.h>
+#include <mlir/Interfaces/InferTypeOpInterface.h>
+#include <mlir/Interfaces/ShapedOpInterfaces.h>
+#include <mlir/Interfaces/SideEffectInterfaces.h>
+#include <mlir/Interfaces/ViewLikeInterface.h>
+
+namespace mlir {
+
+/// Return the list of Range (i.e. offset, size, stride). Each Range
+/// entry contains either the dynamic value or a ConstantIndexOp constructed
+/// with `b` at location `loc`.
+SmallVector<Range, 8> getOrCreateRanges(OffsetSizeAndStrideOpInterface op,
+                                        OpBuilder &b, Location loc);
----------------
chencha3 wrote:

Yes, you are right. And I am going to remove it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78483