[Mlir-commits] [flang] [mlir] [MLIR][OpenMP] Support basic materialization for `omp.private` ops (PR #81715)
Sergio Afonso
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Fri Feb 16 04:26:43 PST 2024
================
@@ -1086,12 +1106,98 @@ convertOmpParallel(omp::ParallelOp opInst, llvm::IRBuilderBase &builder,
// TODO: Perform appropriate actions according to the data-sharing
// attribute (shared, private, firstprivate, ...) of variables.
- // Currently defaults to shared.
+ // Currently shared and private are supported.
auto privCB = [&](InsertPointTy allocaIP, InsertPointTy codeGenIP,
llvm::Value &, llvm::Value &vPtr,
llvm::Value *&replacementValue) -> InsertPointTy {
replacementValue = &vPtr;
+ // If this is a private value, this lambda will return the corresponding
+ // mlir value and its `PrivateClauseOp`. Otherwise, empty values are
+ // returned.
+ auto [privVar, privatizerClone] =
+ [&]() -> std::pair<mlir::Value, omp::PrivateClauseOp> {
+ if (!opInst.getPrivateVars().empty()) {
+ auto privVars = opInst.getPrivateVars();
+ auto privatizers = opInst.getPrivatizers();
+
+ for (auto [privVar, privatizerAttr] :
+ llvm::zip_equal(privVars, *privatizers)) {
+ // Find the MLIR private variable corresponding to the LLVM value
+ // being privatized.
+ llvm::Value *llvmPrivVar = moduleTranslation.lookupValue(privVar);
+ if (llvmPrivVar != &vPtr)
+ continue;
+
+ SymbolRefAttr privSym = llvm::cast<SymbolRefAttr>(privatizerAttr);
+ omp::PrivateClauseOp privatizer =
+ SymbolTable::lookupNearestSymbolFrom<omp::PrivateClauseOp>(
+ opInst, privSym);
+
+ // Clone the privatizer in case it used by more than one parallel
+ // region. The privatizer is processed in-place (see below) before it
+ // gets inlined in the parallel region and therefore processing the
+ // original op is dangerous.
+ return {privVar, privatizer.clone()};
+ }
+ }
+
+ return {mlir::Value(), omp::PrivateClauseOp()};
+ }();
+
+ if (privVar) {
+ if (privatizerClone.getDataSharingType() ==
+ omp::DataSharingClauseType::FirstPrivate) {
+ privatizerClone.emitOpError(
+ "TODO: delayed privatization is not "
+ "supported for `firstprivate` clauses yet.");
+ bodyGenStatus = failure();
+ return codeGenIP;
+ }
+
+ Region &allocRegion = privatizerClone.getAllocRegion();
+
+ if (!allocRegion.hasOneBlock()) {
+ privatizerClone.emitOpError(
+ "TODO: multi-block alloc regions are not supported yet. Seems "
----------------
skatrak wrote:
Nit: Feel free to ignore if you disagree, but in my opinion this is a bit too implementation-specific information for users. I'd just leave "multi-block alloc regions are not supported yet" as the error message and add the rest as a comment in the code.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81715
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list