[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][VectorOps] Add `vector.interleave` operation (PR #80315)
Cullen Rhodes
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Mon Feb 5 03:20:39 PST 2024
================
@@ -2567,3 +2567,26 @@ func.func @load_store_forwarding_rank_mismatch(%v0: vector<4x1x1xf32>, %arg0: te
tensor<4x4x4xf32>, vector<1x100x4x5xf32>
return %r : vector<1x100x4x5xf32>
}
+
+// -----
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: func.func @fold_rank_1_vector_interleave(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[LHS:.*]]: vector<6xi32>, %[[RHS:.*]]: vector<6xi32>)
+func.func @fold_rank_1_vector_interleave(%arg0: vector<6xi32>, %arg1: vector<6xi32>) -> vector<12xi32> {
+ // CHECK: %[[ZIP:.*]] = vector.shuffle %[[LHS]], %[[RHS]] [0, 6, 1, 7, 2, 8, 3, 9, 4, 10, 5, 11] : vector<6xi32>, vector<6xi32>
+ // CHECK: return %[[ZIP]] : vector<12xi32>
+ %0 = vector.interleave %arg0, %arg1 : vector<6xi32>
+ return %0 : vector<12xi32>
+}
+
+// -----
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: func.func @fold_rank_0_vector_interleave(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[LHS:.*]]: vector<f64>, %[[RHS:.*]]: vector<f64>)
+func.func @fold_rank_0_vector_interleave(%arg0: vector<f64>, %arg1: vector<f64>) -> vector<2xf64>
+{
+ // CHECK: %[[ZIP:.*]] = vector.shuffle %[[LHS]], %[[RHS]] [0, 1] : vector<f64>, vector<f64>
+ // CHECK: return %[[ZIP]] : vector<2xf64>
+ %0 = vector.interleave %arg0, %arg1 : vector<f64>
+ return %0 : vector<2xf64>
+}
----------------
c-rhodes wrote:
took me a minute to figure out what's happening here, I'm not sure this test is really necessary. The fold relates to the rank of the result so this is no different to the test above.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80315
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list