[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][sparse] external entry method wrapper for sparse tensors (PR #80326)

[llvmlistbot at llvm.org]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff cc0c8e592f8ff58ab821a04b7dcfb71403b4bea6 f7ee3ea00ef4e6831f50f917d5ad35b32b5d406f -- mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseAssembler.cpp mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/Passes.h mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseTensorPasses.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseAssembler.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseAssembler.cpp
index 23d96fecbb..cf14ba16c5 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseAssembler.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseAssembler.cpp
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ using namespace sparse_tensor;
 // Helper methods.
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
-// TODO: the following loops look very similar to our StorageLayout::foreachField
+// TODO: the following loops look very similar to our
+// StorageLayout::foreachField
 //       loops, so perhaps use these here (once we are confident this approach
 //       works well with external formats
 

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80326