[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][NVVM] Add Op for TMA Store with reduction (PR #118853)

Mehdi Amini llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Sat Dec 7 08:48:22 PST 2024


================
@@ -2029,6 +2029,107 @@ def NVVM_CpAsyncBulkTensorPrefetchOp :
   }];
 }
 
+// List of modes supported for TMA Store and Reduction Ops
+def TMAStoreModeTile   : I32EnumAttrCase<"TILE", 0, "tile">;
+def TMAStoreModeIm2Col : I32EnumAttrCase<"IM2COL", 1, "im2col">;
+
+def TMAStoreMode : I32EnumAttr<"TMAStoreMode", "NVVM TMA Store Mode",
+    [TMAStoreModeTile, TMAStoreModeIm2Col]> {
+  let genSpecializedAttr = 0;
+  let cppNamespace = "::mlir::NVVM";
+}
+def TMAStoreModeAttr : EnumAttr<NVVM_Dialect, TMAStoreMode, "tma_store_mode"> {
+  let assemblyFormat = "`<` $value `>`";
+}
+
+// List of Reduction Ops supported with TMA Store
+def TMAReduxKindAdd : I32EnumAttrCase<"ADD", 0, "add">;
+def TMAReduxKindMin : I32EnumAttrCase<"MIN", 1, "min">;
+def TMAReduxKindMax : I32EnumAttrCase<"MAX", 2, "max">;
+def TMAReduxKindInc : I32EnumAttrCase<"INC", 3, "inc">;
+def TMAReduxKindDec : I32EnumAttrCase<"DEC", 4, "dec">;
+def TMAReduxKindAnd : I32EnumAttrCase<"AND", 5, "and">;
+def TMAReduxKindOr  : I32EnumAttrCase<"OR",  6, "or">;
+def TMAReduxKindXor : I32EnumAttrCase<"XOR", 7, "xor">;
+
+def TMAReduxKind : I32EnumAttr<"TMAReduxKind", "NVVM TMA redux kind",
+    [TMAReduxKindAdd, TMAReduxKindMax, TMAReduxKindMin,
+     TMAReduxKindInc, TMAReduxKindDec, TMAReduxKindAnd,
+     TMAReduxKindOr,  TMAReduxKindXor]> {
+  let genSpecializedAttr = 0;
+  let cppNamespace = "::mlir::NVVM";
+}
+def TMAReduxKindAttr : EnumAttr<NVVM_Dialect, TMAReduxKind, "tma_redux_kind"> {
+  let assemblyFormat = "`<` $value `>`";
+}
+
+def NVVM_CpAsyncBulkTensorReduceOp :
----------------
joker-eph wrote:

You're absolutely right that this is a more "pure" design, I tend to look at the tradeoff in terms of compile-time on this (dialect conversion is non-trivial and that means one extra pass in the pipeline).
The developer experience should be identical I believe, and the debuggability only come from the fact that you don't have the 1:M expansion in MLIR but during the translation. Since this is basically a single switch statement dispatching it, the impact is quite minimal hopefully (there isn't much difference in observing the effect of this 1:M mapping with mlir-opt as MLIR->MLIR transformation vs mlir-translate as MLIR->LLVM IR from a debugging standpoint, it's all in the same level of abstraction and a very local transformation 1 op -> 1 instruction).


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118853


More information about the Mlir-commits mailing list