[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][arith] Add more canonicalization and integration tests coverage (PR #92272)

[Mehdi Amini]

joker-eph wrote:

> I'm not proposing to change how LLVM transformations are developed. 

Not developed, just tested.


>  But for MLIR's lowering passes, 

I don't see any difference right now between the example at hand here for MLIR and most transformations in LLVM.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92272