[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][transform] Fix handling of transitive include in interpreter. (PR #67560)
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Oct 11 22:52:34 PDT 2023
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>,
Ingo =?utf-8?q?Müller?= <ingomueller at google.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm/llvm-project/pull/67560/mlir at github.com>
================
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: mlir-opt %s
----------------
qcolombet wrote:
Do we need a run line here?
If `lit` doesn't skip this file, maybe we could move all the "include" files in a sub-dir and tell lit to ignore these files.
Edit: I see that we have patterns of files like that already (e.g., `mlir/test/Dialect/Transform/test-interpreter-external-symbol-def.mlir`). I don't particularly like this kind of "fake" run line, but maybe we are actually testing something here?
@ftynse what do you think we should do?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67560
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list