[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][emitc] Add a structured for operation (PR #68206)
Jacques Pienaar
llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Oct 4 14:48:51 PDT 2023
================
@@ -246,6 +247,81 @@ def EmitC_DivOp : EmitC_BinaryOp<"div", []> {
let results = (outs FloatIntegerIndexOrOpaqueType);
}
+def EmitC_ForOp : EmitC_Op<"for",
+ [AutomaticAllocationScope, DeclareOpInterfaceMethods<LoopLikeOpInterface,
+ ["getInits", "getSingleInductionVar", "getSingleLowerBound",
+ "getSingleStep", "getSingleUpperBound"]>,
+ AllTypesMatch<["lowerBound", "upperBound", "step"]>,
+ DeclareOpInterfaceMethods<RegionBranchOpInterface,
+ ["getEntrySuccessorOperands"]>,
+ SingleBlockImplicitTerminator<"emitc::YieldOp">,
+ RecursiveMemoryEffects]> {
+ let summary = "for operation";
+ let description = [{
+ The `emitc.for` operation represents a loop taking 3 SSA values as operands
+ that represent the lower bound, upper bound and step respectively. The
+ operation defines an SSA value for its induction variable. It has one
----------------
jpienaar wrote:
This is a bit more restrictive than C isn't it? E.g., you can define a variables inside the clause statement and initialize them. So this would be closer to 3 basic blocks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68206
More information about the Mlir-commits
mailing list