[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [flang] [mlir] Expose type and attribute names in the MLIRContext and abstract type/attr classes (PR #72189)

[Mehdi Amini]

joker-eph wrote:

> Do you think that makes more sense for this PR?

We could if we're confident this is enough. The API should then take a "StringLiteral" (it's more specific than a StringRef) I believe.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72189