[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][arith] doc updates for ub semantics, and int representations (PR #72932)

[Jacob Yu]

pingshiyu wrote:

> > we'd like to leave the overflow behaviour undefined for now,
> 
> It's best if you can split this out of this PR. I'm not objecting to this definition: it's reasonable. I would just want an RFC to get the visibility this entails before we do so (because we intentionally didn't document it as such originally :) ).

Sounds good, that make sense to me. I'll leave the overflow part out for now!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72932