[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][vector] Fix cases with multiple yielded transfer_read ops (PR #71625)

Lei Zhang llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Wed Nov 8 22:07:14 PST 2023


================
@@ -801,13 +801,31 @@ struct WarpOpTransferRead : public OpRewritePattern<WarpExecuteOnLane0Op> {
   using OpRewritePattern<WarpExecuteOnLane0Op>::OpRewritePattern;
   LogicalResult matchAndRewrite(WarpExecuteOnLane0Op warpOp,
                                 PatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
-    OpOperand *operand = getWarpResult(
-        warpOp, [](Operation *op) { return isa<vector::TransferReadOp>(op); });
-    if (!operand)
-      return failure();
-    auto read = operand->get().getDefiningOp<vector::TransferReadOp>();
-    // Don't duplicate transfer_read ops when distributing.
-    if (!read.getResult().hasOneUse())
+    // Try to find a distributable yielded read. Note that this pattern can
+    // still fail at the end after distribution, in which case this might have
+    // missed another distributable read.
+    vector::TransferReadOp read;
+    auto yield = cast<vector::YieldOp>(
----------------
antiagainst wrote:

This is mostly duplicated logic with `getWarpResult`. Should we create `getWarpResults` that return a list of candidates? I'd assume that'd be useful for handling other op cases too? If you don't want to go handle other op cases, we can change `getWarpResult` to just call `getWarpResults` for the first candidate to maintain its existing behavior. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71625


More information about the Mlir-commits mailing list