[llvm-testresults] pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/21168?compare_to=21164&baseline=19898
Nickname: pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:34

Comparing:
     Run: 21168, Order: 199932, Start Time: 2014-01-23 20:38:55, End Time: 2014-01-24 01:24:25
      To: 21164, Order: 199919, Start Time: 2014-01-23 19:05:27, End Time: 2014-01-23 23:49:29
Baseline: 19898, Order: 198654, Start Time: 2014-01-07 01:21:49, End Time: 2014-01-07 06:07:29

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 15 (11 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (12 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1095 (1087 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-10-SignConversions: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ackermann: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 60.00% (0.0200 => 0.0320, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls: 37.50% (0.0320 => 0.0440, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: 18.75% (0.0640 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 16.67% (0.0720 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/objects/objects: 14.29% (0.0840 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-2d/fdtd-2d: 11.54% (0.1040 => 0.1160, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random: 7.02% (0.2280 => 0.2440, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie: 6.04% (0.7280 => 0.7720, std.dev.: 0.0152)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes: 5.13% (0.3120 => 0.3280, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 2.47% (1.1321 => 1.1601, std.dev.: 0.0100)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: 1.31% (0.9161 => 0.9281, std.dev.: 0.0045)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/compare: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/SignlessTypes/shr: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 11.96% (0.3680 => 0.4120, std.dev.: 0.0099)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random: 5.17% (0.2320 => 0.2440, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 1.96% (8.1441 => 8.3041, std.dev.: 0.0533)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 1.41% (23.7574 => 24.0935, std.dev.: 0.0481)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 1.14% (17.6165 => 17.8165, std.dev.: 0.0276)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 20.00% (0.0800 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: 5.56% (0.5040 => 0.5320, std.dev.: 0.0102)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt: -2.93% (1.3641 => 1.3241, std.dev.: 0.0122)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: -2.42% (1.1561 => 1.1281, std.dev.: 0.0083)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl: -2.40% (1.1681 => 1.1401, std.dev.: 0.0091)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: -2.36% (1.1881 => 1.1601, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl: -2.36% (1.1881 => 1.1601, std.dev.: 0.0107)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: -2.31% (1.2121 => 1.1841, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: -2.24% (1.2521 => 1.2241, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: -1.56% (1.2801 => 1.2601, std.dev.: 0.0057)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -16.90% (0.2840 => 0.2360, std.dev.: 0.0020)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: -4.52% (2.3881 => 2.2801, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-dbl/Symbolics-dbl: -1.69% (4.2563 => 4.1843, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: -1.38% (4.0643 => 4.0083, std.dev.: 0.0214)

Report Time: 2.04s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140123/886a616f/attachment.html>