[llvm-testresults] pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Tue Jan 14 11:50:17 PST 2014


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/20521?compare_to=20516&baseline=19898
Nickname: pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:34

Comparing:
     Run: 20521, Order: 199215, Start Time: 2014-01-14 15:10:59, End Time: 2014-01-14 19:55:05
      To: 20516, Order: 199213, Start Time: 2014-01-14 14:16:39, End Time: 2014-01-14 18:58:38
Baseline: 19898, Order: 198654, Start Time: 2014-01-07 01:21:49, End Time: 2014-01-07 06:07:29

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 17 (20 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (2 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1093 (1088 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/compare: 200.00% (0.0080 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/printargs: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Perm: 80.00% (0.0200 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Bubblesort: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/random: 42.86% (0.0280 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench: 35.29% (0.0680 => 0.0920, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: 26.67% (0.0600 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0049)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: 22.22% (0.0720 => 0.0880, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: 12.90% (0.1240 => 0.1400, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/EH/except: 8.77% (0.2280 => 0.2480, std.dev.: 0.0055)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: 4.50% (0.4440 => 0.4640, std.dev.: 0.0072)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt: 2.08% (1.3441 => 1.3721, std.dev.: 0.0104)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: 1.78% (1.1241 => 1.1441, std.dev.: 0.0070)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 1.25% (2.5641 => 2.5961, std.dev.: 0.0088)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: 3.91% (0.5120 => 0.5320, std.dev.: 0.0071)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/nsieve-bits: 3.28% (0.7320 => 0.7560, std.dev.: 0.0092)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/compare: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/member-function-pointers: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/random: 42.86% (0.0280 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: 33.33% (0.0480 => 0.0640, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 20.00% (0.1600 => 0.1920, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/bicg/bicg: 16.67% (0.0720 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/medley/reg_detect/reg_detect: 15.15% (0.1320 => 0.1520, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sieve: 7.69% (0.3120 => 0.3360, std.dev.: 0.0066)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench: 7.50% (0.1600 => 0.1720, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: 4.71% (0.3400 => 0.3560, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3: 4.23% (0.2840 => 0.2960, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 2.14% (1.1241 => 1.1481, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-dbl/StatementReordering-dbl: 2.13% (1.1281 => 1.1521, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 1.93% (6.0160 => 6.1320, std.dev.: 0.0371)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 1.50% (17.6165 => 17.8805, std.dev.: 0.0511)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: 1.50% (10.6960 => 10.8560, std.dev.: 0.0577)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 20.00% (0.0800 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/strcat: 15.62% (0.1280 => 0.1480, std.dev.: 0.0070)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: 5.56% (0.5040 => 0.5320, std.dev.: 0.0071)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: 1.78% (4.5043 => 4.5843, std.dev.: 0.0297)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: -4.52% (2.3881 => 2.2801, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-dbl/Symbolics-dbl: -1.69% (4.2563 => 4.1843, std.dev.: 0.0020)

Report Time: 1.75s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140114/41ff9e58/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list