[llvm-testresults] pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/20259?compare_to=20253&baseline=19898
Nickname: pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:34

Comparing:
     Run: 20259, Order: 198971, Start Time: 2014-01-10 23:57:19, End Time: 2014-01-11 04:41:27
      To: 20253, Order: 198955, Start Time: 2014-01-10 21:52:34, End Time: 2014-01-11 02:33:47
Baseline: 19898, Order: 198654, Start Time: 2014-01-07 01:21:49, End Time: 2014-01-07 06:07:29

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 20 (21 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1090 (1088 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-07-Compare64BitConstant: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/pi: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc: 66.67% (0.0240 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls: 42.86% (0.0280 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: 30.77% (0.0520 => 0.0680, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Queens: 30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/queens: 27.27% (0.0440 => 0.0560, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 10.71% (0.1120 => 0.1240, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 10.00% (0.2000 => 0.2200, std.dev.: 0.0064)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2: 7.14% (0.2800 => 0.3000, std.dev.: 0.0064)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/08-main/main: 6.41% (0.3120 => 0.3320, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 4.09% (0.6840 => 0.7120, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck: 3.74% (0.4280 => 0.4440, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.90% (1.2641 => 1.2881, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 1.75% (1.1401 => 1.1601, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-flt/Recurrences-flt: 1.74% (1.1481 => 1.1681, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt: 1.47% (1.3641 => 1.3841, std.dev.: 0.0072)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 1.26% (0.9561 => 0.9681, std.dev.: 0.0045)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: 100.00% (0.0200 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 2.27% (1.2361 => 1.2641, std.dev.: 0.0067)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 500.00% (0.0040 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-LongShifts: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-07-17-INT-To-FP: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-adpcm/telecomm-adpcm: 27.27% (0.0440 => 0.0560, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/01-qbsort/qbsort: 20.83% (0.0960 => 0.1160, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 17.65% (0.0680 => 0.0800, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/medley/reg_detect/reg_detect: 15.15% (0.1320 => 0.1520, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 4.62% (0.2600 => 0.2720, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 3.20% (1.1241 => 1.1601, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-dbl/StatementReordering-dbl: 2.13% (1.1281 => 1.1521, std.dev.: 0.0090)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-dbl/Recurrences-dbl: 2.11% (1.1361 => 1.1601, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 2.07% (1.1601 => 1.1841, std.dev.: 0.0090)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: 2.04% (1.1761 => 1.2001, std.dev.: 0.0081)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-flt/Recurrences-flt: 1.74% (1.1481 => 1.1681, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt: 1.47% (1.3641 => 1.3841, std.dev.: 0.0072)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 1.26% (0.9561 => 0.9681, std.dev.: 0.0045)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: 66.67% (0.0240 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 25.00% (0.0800 => 0.1000, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi/voronoi: 11.29% (0.2480 => 0.2760, std.dev.: 0.0098)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: 11.11% (0.1080 => 0.1200, std.dev.: 0.0045)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: -1.04% (5.7964 => 5.7364, std.dev.: 0.0206)

Report Time: 1.89s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140110/f9f2ce60/attachment.html>