[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Fri Jan 10 03:54:17 PST 2014


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/20193?compare_to=20182&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 20193, Order: 198924, Start Time: 2014-01-10 10:02:52, End Time: 2014-01-10 11:59:07
      To: 20182, Order: 198918, Start Time: 2014-01-10 07:52:26, End Time: 2014-01-10 09:39:19
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 22 (19 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 11 (5 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1077 (1086 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl: 2.07% (1.2248 => 1.2502, std.dev.: 0.0032)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: 37.11% (0.1458 => 0.1999, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 35.60% (2.9686 => 4.0253, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan: 29.77% (0.0440 => 0.0571, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 16.73% (1.8088 => 2.1114, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon: 9.38% (8.3864 => 9.1730, std.dev.: 0.2824)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 7.56% (0.3812 => 0.4100, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: 4.60% (46.1717 => 48.2955, std.dev.: 0.5285)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 3.93% (12.9281 => 13.4358, std.dev.: 0.0857)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 3.69% (4.2207 => 4.3764, std.dev.: 0.0114)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: 3.46% (5.1793 => 5.3585, std.dev.: 0.0601)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: 3.09% (1.3905 => 1.4334, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 3.08% (6.9446 => 7.1582, std.dev.: 0.0474)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/recursive: 3.01% (2.3251 => 2.3950, std.dev.: 0.0143)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 2.95% (7.5730 => 7.7965, std.dev.: 0.0492)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 2.76% (5.4763 => 5.6273, std.dev.: 0.0375)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft: 2.50% (3.6357 => 3.7267, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 2.48% (3.7342 => 3.8268, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: 2.16% (5.8830 => 6.0099, std.dev.: 0.0161)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 1.68% (3.1402 => 3.1930, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 1.52% (3.8104 => 3.8682, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 1.05% (2.3799 => 2.4050, std.dev.: 0.0097)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hello: -45.88% (0.0255 => 0.0138, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/richards_benchmark: -11.93% (0.0922 => 0.0812, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -5.29% (4.5194 => 4.2803, std.dev.: 0.0818)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: -4.52% (0.9368 => 0.8945, std.dev.: 0.0152)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -2.60% (0.8524 => 0.8302, std.dev.: 0.0064)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: -2.30% (0.6640 => 0.6487, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: -2.24% (0.5356 => 0.5236, std.dev.: 0.0039)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: -36.24% (4.5343 => 2.8909, std.dev.: 0.5703)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -13.69% (0.9689 => 0.8363, std.dev.: 0.0458)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: -9.89% (2.9408 => 2.6501, std.dev.: 0.0270)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/covariance/covariance: -3.15% (4.0630 => 3.9350, std.dev.: 0.0301)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 41.69% (15.7419 => 22.3043, std.dev.: 0.9226)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 2.61% (0.6322 => 0.6487, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 1.99% (0.5134 => 0.5236, std.dev.: 0.0039)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 40.71% (2.8607 => 4.0253, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 20.14% (5.9583 => 7.1582, std.dev.: 0.0474)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 17.56% (1.7960 => 2.1114, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 12.15% (82.2592 => 92.2573, std.dev.: 0.3746)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 8.14% (3.3810 => 3.6563, std.dev.: 0.0055)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 5.51% (7.3892 => 7.7965, std.dev.: 0.0492)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 4.60% (4.1840 => 4.3764, std.dev.: 0.0114)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 2.55% (3.7315 => 3.8268, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/recursive: 2.55% (2.3355 => 2.3950, std.dev.: 0.0143)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 2.33% (5.4994 => 5.6273, std.dev.: 0.0375)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft: 2.10% (3.6501 => 3.7267, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: 1.98% (5.8933 => 6.0099, std.dev.: 0.0161)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: 1.64% (1.4103 => 1.4334, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 1.51% (3.1455 => 3.1930, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: 1.35% (18.6185 => 18.8699, std.dev.: 0.0741)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.34% (11.7894 => 11.9470, std.dev.: 0.0522)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl: -1.33% (1.2670 => 1.2502, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: -1.28% (1.3551 => 1.3377, std.dev.: 0.0040)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -13.52% (15.5356 => 13.4358, std.dev.: 0.0857)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -5.24% (50.9650 => 48.2955, std.dev.: 0.5285)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: -2.93% (6.0535 => 5.8764, std.dev.: 0.0533)

Report Time: 0.76s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140110/e3c4430c/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list