[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Thu Jan 2 17:38:20 PST 2014


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/19571?compare_to=19557&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 19571, Order: 198371, Start Time: 2014-01-02 23:53:53, End Time: 2014-01-03 01:43:01
      To: 19557, Order: 198349, Start Time: 2014-01-02 21:37:18, End Time: 2014-01-02 23:26:37
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 26 (49 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 13 (12 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1071 (1049 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter: 70.15% (0.0851 => 0.1448, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: 47.35% (0.1358 => 0.2001, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 21.12% (1.3320 => 1.6133, std.dev.: 0.0831)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 20.29% (0.3756 => 0.4518, std.dev.: 0.0217)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark: 10.33% (46.0079 => 50.7602, std.dev.: 1.4752)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: 9.21% (1.4741 => 1.6098, std.dev.: 0.0343)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft: 8.48% (0.1721 => 0.1867, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray: 6.22% (0.3197 => 0.3396, std.dev.: 0.0009)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: 5.12% (16.9879 => 17.8576, std.dev.: 0.2534)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 4.18% (2.6337 => 2.7439, std.dev.: 0.0322)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: 42.22% (0.1542 => 0.2193, std.dev.: 0.0215)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: 28.41% (0.7041 => 0.9041, std.dev.: 0.0411)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 21.59% (4.7018 => 5.7171, std.dev.: 0.1498)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop: 16.69% (0.1450 => 0.1692, std.dev.: 0.0008)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/health/health: 16.36% (0.3307 => 0.3848, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1: 14.26% (1.3272 => 1.5164, std.dev.: 0.0154)
  MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi: 13.86% (2.2475 => 2.5590, std.dev.: 0.0683)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 12.63% (0.3579 => 0.4031, std.dev.: 0.0099)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 9.47% (1.0264 => 1.1236, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 7.63% (7.5553 => 8.1321, std.dev.: 0.1723)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 6.03% (2.8080 => 2.9774, std.dev.: 0.0173)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: 2.49% (5.7117 => 5.8542, std.dev.: 0.0345)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 2.24% (7.6881 => 7.8601, std.dev.: 0.0555)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: 2.17% (5.8602 => 5.9872, std.dev.: 0.0196)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 1.98% (5.9473 => 6.0650, std.dev.: 0.0275)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 1.62% (3.8074 => 3.8689, std.dev.: 0.0035)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry: -22.43% (0.0789 => 0.0612, std.dev.: 0.0066)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: -13.92% (0.6083 => 0.5236, std.dev.: 0.0162)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -8.65% (3.0843 => 2.8174, std.dev.: 0.0893)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -7.31% (0.9017 => 0.8358, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt: -6.76% (1.3315 => 1.2415, std.dev.: 0.0103)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -4.12% (4.5253 => 4.3387, std.dev.: 0.0247)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: -3.89% (1.3875 => 1.3335, std.dev.: 0.0138)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: -2.71% (1.2614 => 1.2272, std.dev.: 0.0053)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -2.59% (1.3252 => 1.2909, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: -2.31% (0.4973 => 0.4858, std.dev.: 0.0035)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: -4.57% (4.3038 => 4.1070, std.dev.: 0.0094)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/richards_benchmark: -4.31% (1.4026 => 1.3422, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: -4.07% (1.8928 => 1.8157, std.dev.: 0.0119)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter: 68.96% (0.0857 => 0.1448, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 50.77% (15.7419 => 23.7340, std.dev.: 0.3023)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: 46.17% (0.1369 => 0.2001, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler: 31.85% (0.3859 => 0.5088, std.dev.: 0.0265)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 25.64% (0.3596 => 0.4518, std.dev.: 0.0217)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft: 22.59% (0.1523 => 0.1867, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 21.70% (1.3256 => 1.6133, std.dev.: 0.0831)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/health/health: 21.20% (0.1538 => 0.1864, std.dev.: 0.0100)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh: 16.87% (0.3289 => 0.3844, std.dev.: 0.0215)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 13.37% (1.2200 => 1.3831, std.dev.: 0.0140)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark: 13.00% (44.9186 => 50.7602, std.dev.: 1.4752)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: 10.48% (25.9661 => 28.6872, std.dev.: 1.0436)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: 10.04% (1.4629 => 1.6098, std.dev.: 0.0343)
  MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 9.09% (5.4968 => 5.9964, std.dev.: 0.0525)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 7.64% (2.5491 => 2.7439, std.dev.: 0.0322)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: 6.82% (16.7177 => 17.8576, std.dev.: 0.2534)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray: 5.83% (0.3209 => 0.3396, std.dev.: 0.0009)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib: 4.44% (0.6412 => 0.6697, std.dev.: 0.0058)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: 3.15% (1.2845 => 1.3250, std.dev.: 0.0157)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: 3.13% (1.5198 => 1.5673, std.dev.: 0.0105)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: 2.87% (0.6942 => 0.7141, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 1.57% (4.2717 => 4.3387, std.dev.: 0.0247)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: 63.05% (0.1345 => 0.2193, std.dev.: 0.0215)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: 34.30% (0.6732 => 0.9041, std.dev.: 0.0411)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 24.91% (4.5769 => 5.7171, std.dev.: 0.1498)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop: 24.50% (0.1359 => 0.1692, std.dev.: 0.0008)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1: 23.51% (1.2278 => 1.5164, std.dev.: 0.0154)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 20.04% (0.3358 => 0.4031, std.dev.: 0.0099)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 16.68% (5.9583 => 6.9524, std.dev.: 0.0104)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/health/health: 16.50% (0.3303 => 0.3848, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench: 16.34% (4.0567 => 4.7196, std.dev.: 0.0905)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 12.36% (82.2592 => 92.4270, std.dev.: 0.3313)
  MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi: 10.97% (2.3061 => 2.5590, std.dev.: 0.0683)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: 10.05% (1.0099 => 1.1114, std.dev.: 0.0191)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 9.81% (1.0232 => 1.1236, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 8.84% (3.3810 => 3.6800, std.dev.: 0.0805)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 7.08% (7.5947 => 8.1321, std.dev.: 0.1723)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 6.72% (5.0320 => 5.3704, std.dev.: 0.0131)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 5.84% (2.8130 => 2.9774, std.dev.: 0.0173)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 4.79% (3.4258 => 3.5899, std.dev.: 0.0269)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 4.04% (9.2673 => 9.6418, std.dev.: 0.1194)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 3.97% (0.8745 => 0.9092, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: 2.82% (4.0593 => 4.1738, std.dev.: 0.0420)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: 2.60% (5.7060 => 5.8542, std.dev.: 0.0345)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 2.58% (5.9126 => 6.0650, std.dev.: 0.0275)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh: 2.22% (2.3919 => 2.4450, std.dev.: 0.0161)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 2.17% (7.6931 => 7.8601, std.dev.: 0.0555)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.85% (11.7894 => 12.0076, std.dev.: 0.0433)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 1.45% (4.2978 => 4.3601, std.dev.: 0.0219)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/fourinarow/fourinarow: -6.20% (0.2824 => 0.2649, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -5.61% (1.3676 => 1.2909, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: -3.55% (1.2724 => 1.2272, std.dev.: 0.0053)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: -1.86% (1.3146 => 1.2901, std.dev.: 0.0068)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode: -17.20% (0.1035 => 0.0857, std.dev.: 0.0049)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -14.90% (15.5356 => 13.2213, std.dev.: 0.1116)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: -5.37% (23.4696 => 22.2095, std.dev.: 0.3850)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: -4.52% (0.4029 => 0.3847, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/EH/except: -3.65% (0.4987 => 0.4805, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: -2.01% (4.6123 => 4.5196, std.dev.: 0.0316)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon: -1.47% (8.5010 => 8.3757, std.dev.: 0.0399)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: -1.10% (6.0535 => 5.9872, std.dev.: 0.0196)

Report Time: 0.72s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140102/4d77d72f/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list