[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Mon Sep 23 15:33:37 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/15595?compare_to=15591&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 15595, Order: 191216, Start Time: 2013-09-23 20:47:09, End Time: 2013-09-23 22:36:23
      To: 15591, Order: 191209, Start Time: 2013-09-23 18:28:05, End Time: 2013-09-23 20:20:22
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 8 (17 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 14 (15 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1085 (1075 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3: 10.01% (0.4604 => 0.5065, std.dev.: 0.0006)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 9.76% (1.1085 => 1.2167, std.dev.: 0.0373)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 7.11% (1.2575 => 1.3469, std.dev.: 0.0133)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/fourinarow/fourinarow: 6.06% (0.4325 => 0.4587, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: 3.59% (1.8157 => 1.8809, std.dev.: 0.0100)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: 1.61% (0.7219 => 0.7335, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt: 1.09% (3.5421 => 3.5808, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 1.09% (2.3983 => 2.4244, std.dev.: 0.0013)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/netbench-crc/netbench-crc: -43.80% (0.1945 => 0.1093, std.dev.: 0.0179)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uuencode/uuencode: -39.69% (0.0834 => 0.0503, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk: -36.48% (0.1875 => 0.1191, std.dev.: 0.0191)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms: -35.38% (1.4665 => 0.9476, std.dev.: 0.1518)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -31.46% (0.3853 => 0.2641, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl: -12.20% (1.4273 => 1.2532, std.dev.: 0.0191)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: -11.23% (1.6657 => 1.4787, std.dev.: 0.0284)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: -9.45% (0.4147 => 0.3755, std.dev.: 0.0124)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -2.84% (1.2527 => 1.2171, std.dev.: 0.0129)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uuencode/uuencode: -33.51% (0.0367 => 0.0244, std.dev.: 0.0029)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: -33.37% (0.0863 => 0.0575, std.dev.: 0.0013)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: -4.32% (6.1671 => 5.9004, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl: -1.70% (5.7060 => 5.6092, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: -1.23% (6.0850 => 6.0101, std.dev.: 0.0039)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 3.89% (0.1312 => 0.1363, std.dev.: 0.0054)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ALAC/decode/alacconvert-decode: 3.61% (1.1393 => 1.1804, std.dev.: 0.0098)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 2.16% (0.5046 => 0.5155, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 2.11% (4.2242 => 4.3134, std.dev.: 0.0242)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: 1.22% (1.2630 => 1.2784, std.dev.: 0.0040)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft: 18.49% (0.1374 => 0.1628, std.dev.: 0.0094)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 10.48% (1.1013 => 1.2167, std.dev.: 0.0373)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 8.85% (6.1088 => 6.6493, std.dev.: 0.1828)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 7.61% (1.2516 => 1.3469, std.dev.: 0.0133)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: 6.14% (6.5990 => 7.0043, std.dev.: 0.1326)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 3.56% (2.8194 => 2.9198, std.dev.: 0.0370)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 2.91% (3.5310 => 3.6339, std.dev.: 0.0387)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: 2.45% (0.5182 => 0.5309, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 2.24% (4.2733 => 4.3692, std.dev.: 0.0164)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: 1.57% (1.8519 => 1.8809, std.dev.: 0.0100)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.49% (3.1569 => 3.2040, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.37% (16.7972 => 17.0275, std.dev.: 0.0492)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 1.09% (6.6028 => 6.6750, std.dev.: 0.0090)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -54.82% (0.5226 => 0.2361, std.dev.: 0.0091)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -46.77% (1.5790 => 0.8405, std.dev.: 0.0337)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -21.06% (57.2347 => 45.1787, std.dev.: 4.0366)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -20.02% (15.9508 => 12.7578, std.dev.: 0.9886)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: -12.50% (0.3304 => 0.2891, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -12.13% (20.8247 => 18.2977, std.dev.: 0.2170)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -10.47% (3.4956 => 3.1296, std.dev.: 0.0421)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -7.65% (50.0284 => 46.1999, std.dev.: 0.3792)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -3.38% (3.7437 => 3.6171, std.dev.: 0.0183)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -3.38% (4.3592 => 4.2120, std.dev.: 0.0523)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -2.32% (17.1431 => 16.7450, std.dev.: 0.0511)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -1.96% (2.5938 => 2.5429, std.dev.: 0.0092)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: -1.88% (3.8582 => 3.7856, std.dev.: 0.0121)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: -1.86% (0.7474 => 0.7335, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: -1.30% (4.9991 => 4.9341, std.dev.: 0.0232)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.11% (0.1348 => 0.1363, std.dev.: 0.0054)

Report Time: 0.64s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130923/8f1d103c/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list