[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results
llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Tue Sep 17 10:53:59 PDT 2013
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/15390?compare_to=15387&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16
Comparing:
Run: 15390, Order: 190864, Start Time: 2013-09-17 16:05:15, End Time: 2013-09-17 17:56:38
To: 15387, Order: 190863, Start Time: 2013-09-17 14:01:10, End Time: 2013-09-17 15:44:20
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18
===============
Tests Summary
===============
Performance Regressions: 10 (20 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 5 (17 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1092 (1070 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108
===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: 13.02% (33.1465 => 37.4632, std.dev.: 0.4654)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount: 4.70% (0.2572 => 0.2693, std.dev.: 0.0016)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: 1.23% (1.2472 => 1.2625, std.dev.: 0.0047)
Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan: 26.49% (0.0453 => 0.0573, std.dev.: 0.0000)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: 9.48% (0.1803 => 0.1974, std.dev.: 0.0009)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 7.94% (4.9549 => 5.3482, std.dev.: 0.0797)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 5.32% (7.5195 => 7.9198, std.dev.: 0.1463)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.74% (4.5766 => 4.7935, std.dev.: 0.0151)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: 4.34% (3.8967 => 4.0659, std.dev.: 0.0018)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 1.55% (1.1211 => 1.1385, std.dev.: 0.0025)
Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: -13.24% (7.4329 => 6.4489, std.dev.: 0.2030)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: -2.86% (5.4357 => 5.2804, std.dev.: 0.0560)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu: -2.80% (2.0223 => 1.9657, std.dev.: 0.0218)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-dbl/Reductions-dbl: -1.99% (12.1421 => 11.9001, std.dev.: 0.0341)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -1.94% (3.8638 => 3.7888, std.dev.: 0.0212)
Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.60% (0.1343 => 0.1351, std.dev.: 0.0034)
================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: 14.37% (32.7552 => 37.4632, std.dev.: 0.4654)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft: 1.84% (1.0756 => 1.0954, std.dev.: 0.0036)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 1.80% (14.4764 => 14.7374, std.dev.: 0.0231)
MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd: 1.68% (1.5696 => 1.5959, std.dev.: 0.0026)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: 1.67% (1.4033 => 1.4268, std.dev.: 0.0085)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan: 1.64% (1.0952 => 1.1132, std.dev.: 0.0070)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: 1.56% (1.8775 => 1.9068, std.dev.: 0.0072)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench: 1.13% (1.2484 => 1.2625, std.dev.: 0.0047)
Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft: 18.41% (0.1374 => 0.1627, std.dev.: 0.0000)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 8.20% (4.9428 => 5.3482, std.dev.: 0.0797)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 6.65% (1.1013 => 1.1745, std.dev.: 0.0210)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: 6.13% (3.8312 => 4.0659, std.dev.: 0.0018)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: 5.51% (0.1871 => 0.1974, std.dev.: 0.0009)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.79% (4.5744 => 4.7935, std.dev.: 0.0151)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver/gemver: 3.57% (0.3836 => 0.3973, std.dev.: 0.0015)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1: 2.36% (1.7652 => 1.8068, std.dev.: 0.0080)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: 2.08% (1.8519 => 1.8905, std.dev.: 0.0037)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.82% (3.1569 => 3.2145, std.dev.: 0.0035)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 1.62% (6.6028 => 6.7099, std.dev.: 0.0121)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.57% (16.7972 => 17.0617, std.dev.: 0.0404)
Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -54.57% (0.5226 => 0.2374, std.dev.: 0.0009)
MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -47.18% (1.5790 => 0.8341, std.dev.: 0.0353)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -23.94% (57.2347 => 43.5335, std.dev.: 4.6414)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -18.11% (15.9508 => 13.0629, std.dev.: 0.4968)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: -12.59% (0.3304 => 0.2888, std.dev.: 0.0042)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -11.12% (50.0284 => 44.4663, std.dev.: 0.4334)
SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -11.02% (20.8247 => 18.5299, std.dev.: 0.2011)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -10.32% (3.4956 => 3.1350, std.dev.: 0.0381)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: -6.08% (0.3501 => 0.3288, std.dev.: 0.0024)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -3.49% (2.5938 => 2.5034, std.dev.: 0.0160)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -3.27% (4.3592 => 4.2168, std.dev.: 0.0301)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: -3.06% (5.4473 => 5.2804, std.dev.: 0.0560)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-apml/fdtd-apml: -2.49% (1.2896 => 1.2575, std.dev.: 0.0094)
MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -2.49% (3.7437 => 3.6506, std.dev.: 0.0171)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -1.99% (17.1431 => 16.8028, std.dev.: 0.0737)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: -1.63% (89.7126 => 88.2539, std.dev.: 0.2405)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: -1.60% (3.8582 => 3.7964, std.dev.: 0.0115)
Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.22% (0.1348 => 0.1351, std.dev.: 0.0034)
Report Time: 1.06s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130917/3d98f2b0/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-testresults
mailing list