[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Sun Sep 15 15:42:19 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/15324?compare_to=15321&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 15324, Order: 190769, Start Time: 2013-09-15 20:59:41, End Time: 2013-09-15 22:44:56
      To: 15321, Order: 190767, Start Time: 2013-09-15 18:51:24, End Time: 2013-09-15 20:38:51
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 18 (23 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 3 (18 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1086 (1066 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: 91.52% (25.1757 => 48.2174, std.dev.: 2.3733)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/pi: 49.08% (1.7491 => 2.6076, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon: 15.18% (8.4937 => 9.7834, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode: 12.64% (0.0910 => 0.1025, std.dev.: 0.0023)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 11.68% (1.8914 => 2.1123, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 7.67% (1.2566 => 1.3530, std.dev.: 0.0020)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 7.44% (7.6672 => 8.2374, std.dev.: 0.0677)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 7.26% (3.6819 => 3.9491, std.dev.: 0.0006)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter: 4.30% (0.3073 => 0.3205, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 2.72% (4.4969 => 4.6190, std.dev.: 0.0129)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: 2.65% (2.8681 => 2.9442, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2: 2.24% (3.6014 => 3.6819, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 2.20% (2.8945 => 2.9583, std.dev.: 0.0086)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/cholesky/cholesky: 2.16% (1.4685 => 1.5002, std.dev.: 0.0118)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 2.09% (2.3748 => 2.4245, std.dev.: 0.0017)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 1.88% (3.4475 => 3.5123, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/life/life: 1.41% (2.5158 => 2.5513, std.dev.: 0.0010)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 1.20% (6.7395 => 6.8206, std.dev.: 0.0007)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: -5.75% (0.1775 => 0.1673, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh: -5.24% (0.3416 => 0.3237, std.dev.: 0.0052)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/recursive: -2.86% (2.3610 => 2.2935, std.dev.: 0.0240)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -1.03% (0.1363 => 0.1349, std.dev.: 0.0046)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 3.27% (0.8014 => 0.8276, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 2.91% (4.0397 => 4.1574, std.dev.: 0.0419)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 1.73% (0.6297 => 0.6406, std.dev.: 0.0010)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/pi: 57.33% (1.6574 => 2.6076, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 38.30% (2.8554 => 3.9491, std.dev.: 0.0006)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 18.61% (1.7809 => 2.1123, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon: 14.75% (8.5256 => 9.7834, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes: 8.59% (0.8273 => 0.8984, std.dev.: 0.0109)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 8.10% (1.2516 => 1.3530, std.dev.: 0.0020)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 6.64% (0.5561 => 0.5930, std.dev.: 0.0004)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 5.47% (1.1013 => 1.1615, std.dev.: 0.0066)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 5.09% (0.3771 => 0.3963, std.dev.: 0.0001)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 4.93% (2.8194 => 2.9583, std.dev.: 0.0086)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: 4.74% (20.8247 => 21.8126, std.dev.: 0.1516)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 3.34% (4.4696 => 4.6190, std.dev.: 0.0129)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1: 2.72% (1.7652 => 1.8132, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 2.58% (7.5877 => 7.7833, std.dev.: 0.0524)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 2.07% (1.4528 => 1.4829, std.dev.: 0.0006)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 2.02% (3.7874 => 3.8640, std.dev.: 0.0002)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.84% (3.1569 => 3.2151, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 1.74% (7.3703 => 7.4988, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.35% (16.7972 => 17.0239, std.dev.: 0.0483)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 1.15% (6.7429 => 6.8206, std.dev.: 0.0007)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/casts: -21.04% (0.1483 => 0.1171)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench: -9.29% (0.1195 => 0.1084, std.dev.: 0.0004)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: -8.48% (0.2571 => 0.2353, std.dev.: 0.0023)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_stepfft: -5.27% (0.1956 => 0.1853, std.dev.: 0.0001)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_expandfft: -4.61% (0.2193 => 0.2092, std.dev.: 0.0001)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: -17.99% (3.5900 => 2.9442, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -15.75% (57.2347 => 48.2174, std.dev.: 2.3733)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -14.85% (1.7197 => 1.4643, std.dev.: 0.0703)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: -12.29% (0.3304 => 0.2898, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -7.58% (3.7437 => 3.4600, std.dev.: 0.0697)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort: -6.29% (3.0111 => 2.8216, std.dev.: 0.0529)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_expandfft: -5.59% (30.1838 => 28.4978, std.dev.: 0.0266)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: -5.38% (0.7474 => 0.7072, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: -3.91% (7.7964 => 7.4918, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/nsieve-bits: -3.54% (1.1075 => 1.0683, std.dev.: 0.0105)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: -2.56% (5.2009 => 5.0676, std.dev.: 0.0341)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: -1.75% (3.8582 => 3.7908, std.dev.: 0.0100)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: -1.19% (89.7126 => 88.6451, std.dev.: 0.2549)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.07% (0.1348 => 0.1349, std.dev.: 0.0046)

Report Time: 0.74s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130915/60835620/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list