[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Sat Oct 26 22:37:54 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/16723?compare_to=16719&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 16723, Order: 193489, Start Time: 2013-10-27 03:45:41, End Time: 2013-10-27 05:41:17
      To: 16719, Order: 193485, Start Time: 2013-10-26 23:34:43, End Time: 2013-10-27 01:15:51
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 22 (26 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 5 (15 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1080 (1066 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/compare: 95.18% (0.0166 => 0.0324, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: 23.21% (33.5131 => 41.2930, std.dev.: 1.1140)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt: 22.89% (1.2331 => 1.5153, std.dev.: 0.0897)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: 19.88% (1.3198 => 1.5822, std.dev.: 0.0790)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 18.16% (1.3096 => 1.5474, std.dev.: 0.0576)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-flt/InductionVariable-flt: 17.38% (1.2984 => 1.5240, std.dev.: 0.0797)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: 16.69% (2.5323 => 2.9550, std.dev.: 0.0435)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: 16.67% (1.3342 => 1.5566, std.dev.: 0.0066)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: 16.32% (1.2173 => 1.4160, std.dev.: 0.0199)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl: 13.29% (1.2532 => 1.4197, std.dev.: 0.0600)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 12.32% (1.2261 => 1.3771, std.dev.: 0.0367)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-basicmath/automotive-basicmath: 10.25% (0.1522 => 0.1678, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod: 2.38% (7.6759 => 7.8589, std.dev.: 0.0421)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: 10.65% (95.0846 => 105.2156, std.dev.: 1.8200)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes: 9.30% (0.8301 => 0.9073, std.dev.: 0.0208)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: 7.97% (4.0953 => 4.4216, std.dev.: 0.0798)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 5.62% (0.9809 => 1.0360, std.dev.: 0.0198)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.54% (4.5752 => 4.7828, std.dev.: 0.0779)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 3.46% (5.9022 => 6.1067, std.dev.: 0.0706)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 2.96% (1.3929 => 1.4341, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 2.18% (0.8939 => 0.9134, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 1.75% (4.2157 => 4.2894, std.dev.: 0.0074)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: -7.61% (25.5539 => 23.6098, std.dev.: 0.0981)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: -7.29% (4.1616 => 3.8584, std.dev.: 0.1079)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -2.63% (4.1377 => 4.0288, std.dev.: 0.0364)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -2.19% (3.4317 => 3.3567, std.dev.: 0.0276)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: -1.95% (4.5647 => 4.4755, std.dev.: 0.0290)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: - (0.1375 => 0.1375, std.dev.: 0.0014)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: 26.07% (32.7552 => 41.2930, std.dev.: 1.1140)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt: 21.23% (1.2499 => 1.5153, std.dev.: 0.0897)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: 20.57% (1.3123 => 1.5822, std.dev.: 0.0790)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 18.70% (1.3036 => 1.5474, std.dev.: 0.0576)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: 17.93% (1.2007 => 1.4160, std.dev.: 0.0199)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: 17.61% (1.3235 => 1.5566, std.dev.: 0.0066)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-flt/InductionVariable-flt: 17.40% (1.2981 => 1.5240, std.dev.: 0.0797)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: 15.13% (2.5666 => 2.9550, std.dev.: 0.0435)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 13.32% (1.2152 => 1.3771, std.dev.: 0.0367)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl: 12.48% (1.2622 => 1.4197, std.dev.: 0.0600)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod: 6.16% (7.4026 => 7.8589, std.dev.: 0.0421)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 60.93% (7.6426 => 12.2992, std.dev.: 0.0417)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 45.79% (2.8554 => 4.1628, std.dev.: 0.0289)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 10.21% (0.3771 => 0.4156, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes: 9.67% (0.8273 => 0.9073, std.dev.: 0.0208)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: 8.71% (96.7834 => 105.2156, std.dev.: 1.8200)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop: 8.56% (0.1331 => 0.1445, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: 7.81% (4.1011 => 4.4216, std.dev.: 0.0798)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 5.10% (3.1730 => 3.3349, std.dev.: 0.0373)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.56% (4.5744 => 4.7828, std.dev.: 0.0779)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 3.94% (0.2842 => 0.2954, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 3.40% (5.9061 => 6.1067, std.dev.: 0.0706)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.12% (89.7126 => 92.5091, std.dev.: 0.1471)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1: 2.45% (1.7652 => 1.8085, std.dev.: 0.0077)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 2.09% (1.0477 => 1.0696, std.dev.: 0.0070)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.46% (16.7972 => 17.0419, std.dev.: 0.0087)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -53.08% (0.5226 => 0.2452, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -42.15% (1.5790 => 0.9134, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -24.14% (57.2347 => 43.4197, std.dev.: 1.8217)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: -18.16% (0.3304 => 0.2704, std.dev.: 0.0181)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -16.24% (15.9508 => 13.3599, std.dev.: 0.7394)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -13.27% (50.0284 => 43.3886, std.dev.: 0.8899)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -11.23% (20.8247 => 18.4854, std.dev.: 0.1267)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -10.34% (3.7437 => 3.3567, std.dev.: 0.0276)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -10.20% (3.4956 => 3.1392, std.dev.: 0.0200)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -6.43% (8.1346 => 7.6118, std.dev.: 0.1209)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -3.31% (3.7874 => 3.6622, std.dev.: 0.0121)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -3.01% (17.1431 => 16.6277, std.dev.: 0.1291)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: -2.76% (7.3703 => 7.1666, std.dev.: 0.0512)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -2.31% (2.5938 => 2.5338, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -1.60% (4.3592 => 4.2894, std.dev.: 0.0074)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 2.00% (0.1348 => 0.1375, std.dev.: 0.0014)

Report Time: 0.71s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131027/01d299b6/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list