[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results
llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Fri Oct 18 13:38:32 PDT 2013
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/16453?compare_to=16449&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16
Comparing:
Run: 16453, Order: 192988, Start Time: 2013-10-18 18:50:28, End Time: 2013-10-18 20:41:46
To: 16449, Order: 192982, Start Time: 2013-10-18 16:38:27, End Time: 2013-10-18 18:28:02
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18
===============
Tests Summary
===============
Performance Regressions: 20 (34 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 3 (19 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1084 (1054 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108
===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver/gemver: 63.89% (0.0828 => 0.1357, std.dev.: 0.0089)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: 52.57% (0.0875 => 0.1335, std.dev.: 0.0057)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 11.13% (4.1704 => 4.6344, std.dev.: 0.0566)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 6.48% (0.6434 => 0.6851, std.dev.: 0.0082)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray: 3.52% (0.3299 => 0.3415, std.dev.: 0.0018)
Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: 26.68% (35.9612 => 45.5553, std.dev.: 1.8968)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: 16.23% (40.6756 => 47.2783, std.dev.: 1.2258)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: 14.77% (60.8171 => 69.7978, std.dev.: 2.3629)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: 14.68% (21.5059 => 24.6623, std.dev.: 0.7238)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: 12.03% (3.5234 => 3.9471, std.dev.: 0.0304)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: 6.66% (2.6522 => 2.8288, std.dev.: 0.0371)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trmm/trmm: 6.49% (2.9187 => 3.1081, std.dev.: 0.0426)
MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha: 4.81% (3.6067 => 3.7802, std.dev.: 0.0046)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: 4.09% (3.4930 => 3.6359, std.dev.: 0.0432)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 3.75% (4.5800 => 4.7517, std.dev.: 0.0410)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 3.05% (12.8550 => 13.2467, std.dev.: 0.0501)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: 2.94% (1.0113 => 1.0410, std.dev.: 0.0107)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 2.68% (7.3636 => 7.5606, std.dev.: 0.0720)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 2.01% (8.5126 => 8.6840, std.dev.: 0.0366)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: 1.55% (5.8700 => 5.9609, std.dev.: 0.0217)
Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: -23.99% (0.1901 => 0.1445, std.dev.: 0.0139)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists: -2.74% (16.2094 => 15.7659, std.dev.: 0.1266)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: -2.05% (23.8131 => 23.3244, std.dev.: 0.1827)
Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.82% (0.1346 => 0.1357, std.dev.: 0.0232)
================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver/gemver: 65.69% (0.0819 => 0.1357, std.dev.: 0.0089)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: 52.92% (0.0873 => 0.1335, std.dev.: 0.0057)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 18.55% (2.6492 => 3.1407, std.dev.: 0.1868)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 14.72% (4.0397 => 4.6344, std.dev.: 0.0566)
MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 13.14% (16.5902 => 18.7707, std.dev.: 0.6597)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/08-main/main: 8.89% (0.2870 => 0.3125, std.dev.: 0.0094)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 8.80% (0.6297 => 0.6851, std.dev.: 0.0082)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray: 4.66% (0.3263 => 0.3415, std.dev.: 0.0018)
MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg: 3.55% (1.3994 => 1.4491, std.dev.: 0.0111)
Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 63.50% (7.6426 => 12.4954, std.dev.: 0.0852)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: 23.65% (36.8417 => 45.5553, std.dev.: 1.8968)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: 16.57% (40.5588 => 47.2783, std.dev.: 1.2258)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: 14.97% (60.7119 => 69.7978, std.dev.: 2.3629)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: 14.59% (21.5217 => 24.6623, std.dev.: 0.7238)
SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 6.83% (0.5561 => 0.5941, std.dev.: 0.0058)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: 6.43% (2.6579 => 2.8288, std.dev.: 0.0371)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 5.82% (3.1730 => 3.3578, std.dev.: 0.0546)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trmm/trmm: 5.82% (2.9372 => 3.1081, std.dev.: 0.0426)
MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha: 5.80% (3.5731 => 3.7802, std.dev.: 0.0046)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 4.48% (4.5479 => 4.7517, std.dev.: 0.0410)
MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 4.18% (14.7810 => 15.3982, std.dev.: 0.1558)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm: 3.52% (2.5368 => 2.6260, std.dev.: 0.0245)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.46% (89.7126 => 92.8181, std.dev.: 0.3018)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1: 2.86% (1.7652 => 1.8156, std.dev.: 0.0020)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 2.71% (1.1013 => 1.1312, std.dev.: 0.0115)
MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 2.35% (3.5310 => 3.6141, std.dev.: 0.0037)
MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 1.85% (8.1346 => 8.2851, std.dev.: 0.0246)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.65% (8.5434 => 8.6840, std.dev.: 0.0366)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: 1.63% (1.8519 => 1.8821, std.dev.: 0.0081)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: 1.52% (5.8715 => 5.9609, std.dev.: 0.0217)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/richards_benchmark: 1.35% (1.4012 => 1.4201, std.dev.: 0.0049)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 1.25% (2.4920 => 2.5232, std.dev.: 0.0113)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.08% (16.7972 => 16.9791, std.dev.: 0.0390)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 1.06% (3.9552 => 3.9973, std.dev.: 0.0025)
Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/casts: -20.36% (0.1483 => 0.1181, std.dev.: 0.0051)
Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -54.46% (0.5226 => 0.2380, std.dev.: 0.0389)
MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -42.36% (1.5790 => 0.9102, std.dev.: 0.0034)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: -29.23% (5.0288 => 3.5591, std.dev.: 0.0089)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -23.11% (57.2347 => 44.0095, std.dev.: 1.9108)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: -22.77% (0.1871 => 0.1445, std.dev.: 0.0139)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -18.22% (50.0284 => 40.9124, std.dev.: 2.5821)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -16.95% (15.9508 => 13.2467, std.dev.: 0.0501)
SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -11.65% (20.8247 => 18.3976, std.dev.: 0.2562)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -10.65% (3.4956 => 3.1234, std.dev.: 0.0285)
MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: -5.70% (8.1785 => 7.7120, std.dev.: 0.0732)
MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -4.52% (3.7437 => 3.5745, std.dev.: 0.0314)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -3.62% (2.5938 => 2.4999, std.dev.: 0.0138)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -2.89% (3.7874 => 3.6781, std.dev.: 0.0094)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists: -2.78% (16.2163 => 15.7659, std.dev.: 0.1266)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -2.26% (17.1431 => 16.7562, std.dev.: 0.0364)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -1.79% (2.4471 => 2.4032, std.dev.: 0.0115)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -1.79% (4.3592 => 4.2813, std.dev.: 0.0131)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray: -1.46% (4.9459 => 4.8736, std.dev.: 0.0149)
Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.67% (0.1348 => 0.1357, std.dev.: 0.0232)
Report Time: 0.72s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131018/fb041d59/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-testresults
mailing list