[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1O3-plainclang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

Tue Oct 1 05:19:41 PDT 2013

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/15854?compare_to=15850&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 15854, Order: 191735, Start Time: 2013-10-01 10:33:07, End Time: 2013-10-01 12:22:36
      To: 15850, Order: 191732, Start Time: 2013-10-01 08:21:59, End Time: 2013-10-01 10:07:11
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 26 (37 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 4 (14 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1077 (1056 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 86.24% (0.0327 => 0.0609, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 84.71% (0.0242 => 0.0447, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2009-04-16-BitfieldInitialization: 78.17% (0.0229 => 0.0408, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-26-Shorts: 65.20% (0.0227 => 0.0375, std.dev.: 0.0008)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto: 64.60% (0.0161 => 0.0265, std.dev.: 0.0017)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose: 64.39% (0.0278 => 0.0457, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-07-VarArgs: 54.72% (0.0265 => 0.0410, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench: 28.08% (0.0787 => 0.1008, std.dev.: 0.0077)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 13.90% (4.1086 => 4.6798, std.dev.: 0.0333)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 12.54% (1.9979 => 2.2485, std.dev.: 0.0212)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 11.00% (0.1100 => 0.1221, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1: 6.90% (0.3114 => 0.3329, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile: 6.22% (0.3584 => 0.3807, std.dev.: 0.0068)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: 56.74% (1.4617 => 2.2910, std.dev.: 0.1302)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: 47.37% (2.8608 => 4.2161, std.dev.: 0.3417)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: 13.26% (3.5963 => 4.0732, std.dev.: 0.1441)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 10.55% (4.9530 => 5.4755, std.dev.: 0.0270)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 8.74% (7.4978 => 8.1530, std.dev.: 0.0297)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 5.65% (2.8177 => 2.9770, std.dev.: 0.0131)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: 4.36% (2.6512 => 2.7668, std.dev.: 0.0385)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: 3.11% (4.0818 => 4.2089, std.dev.: 0.0081)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 2.33% (9.3569 => 9.5751, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 1.83% (1.1226 => 1.1431, std.dev.: 0.0006)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fbench: 1.82% (4.9056 => 4.9947, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM: 1.81% (0.7165 => 0.7295, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 1.04% (2.3958 => 2.4206, std.dev.: 0.0023)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: -2.03% (5.6255 => 5.5113, std.dev.: 0.0255)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: -1.95% (8.6923 => 8.5227, std.dev.: 0.0356)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -1.74% (2.5432 => 2.4989, std.dev.: 0.0118)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: -1.44% (89.7547 => 88.4601, std.dev.: 0.3396)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -0.52% (0.1357 => 0.1350, std.dev.: 0.0105)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 80.71% (0.0337 => 0.0609, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 78.09% (0.0251 => 0.0447, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-26-Shorts: 75.23% (0.0214 => 0.0375, std.dev.: 0.0008)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose: 65.58% (0.0276 => 0.0457, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto: 64.60% (0.0161 => 0.0265, std.dev.: 0.0017)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2009-04-16-BitfieldInitialization: 64.52% (0.0248 => 0.0408, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-07-VarArgs: 50.74% (0.0272 => 0.0410, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench: 30.23% (0.0774 => 0.1008, std.dev.: 0.0077)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 15.85% (4.0397 => 4.6798, std.dev.: 0.0333)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 15.45% (1.9476 => 2.2485, std.dev.: 0.0212)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 10.40% (0.1106 => 0.1221, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1: 7.84% (0.3087 => 0.3329, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/g721/g721encode/encode: 7.02% (0.2335 => 0.2499, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile: 5.84% (0.3597 => 0.3807, std.dev.: 0.0068)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish: 3.71% (0.3096 => 0.3211, std.dev.: 0.0006)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 63.55% (7.6426 => 12.4997, std.dev.: 0.0893)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: 33.22% (1.7197 => 2.2910, std.dev.: 0.1302)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 10.78% (4.9428 => 5.4755, std.dev.: 0.0270)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: 6.16% (3.8312 => 4.0673, std.dev.: 0.0108)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 6.10% (8.1346 => 8.6312, std.dev.: 0.0934)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 5.59% (2.8194 => 2.9770, std.dev.: 0.0131)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 5.12% (0.5561 => 0.5846, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 4.57% (7.7964 => 8.1530, std.dev.: 0.0297)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: 4.10% (2.6579 => 2.7668, std.dev.: 0.0385)
  MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 3.84% (14.7810 => 15.3484, std.dev.: 0.1958)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: 3.68% (4.0596 => 4.2089, std.dev.: 0.0081)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 3.33% (5.3716 => 5.5507, std.dev.: 0.0601)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver/gemver: 3.23% (0.3836 => 0.3960, std.dev.: 0.0016)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5: 3.06% (2.1472 => 2.2128, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1: 2.75% (1.7652 => 1.8138, std.dev.: 0.0013)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/power/power: 2.40% (1.2170 => 1.2462, std.dev.: 0.0003)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4: 1.99% (1.8519 => 1.8887, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 1.95% (2.4920 => 2.5407, std.dev.: 0.0108)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.72% (3.1569 => 3.2112, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des: 1.45% (1.6707 => 1.6950, std.dev.: 0.0007)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 1.40% (9.4433 => 9.5751, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.19% (16.7972 => 16.9970, std.dev.: 0.0401)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -55.28% (0.5226 => 0.2337, std.dev.: 0.0577)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -46.71% (1.5790 => 0.8415, std.dev.: 0.0326)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -20.83% (57.2347 => 45.3100, std.dev.: 2.4661)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -18.09% (15.9508 => 13.0651, std.dev.: 0.3480)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: -12.11% (0.3304 => 0.2904, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -11.58% (20.8247 => 18.4127, std.dev.: 0.1826)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -6.14% (50.0284 => 46.9573, std.dev.: 0.4111)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: -4.94% (0.6563 => 0.6239, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -3.81% (4.3592 => 4.1930, std.dev.: 0.0537)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -3.66% (2.5938 => 2.4989, std.dev.: 0.0118)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: -3.12% (5.4473 => 5.2771, std.dev.: 0.0356)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: -1.40% (89.7126 => 88.4601, std.dev.: 0.3396)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-apml/fdtd-apml: -1.23% (1.2896 => 1.2737, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -1.08% (2.4471 => 2.4206, std.dev.: 0.0023)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.15% (0.1348 => 0.1350, std.dev.: 0.0105)

Report Time: 1.05s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131001/7e04af29/attachment.html>

[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1O3-plainclang_DEV__powerpc64 test results