[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results
llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Sun Nov 3 01:20:55 PST 2013
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/16959?compare_to=16955&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16
Comparing:
Run: 16959, Order: 193943, Start Time: 2013-11-03 07:33:03, End Time: 2013-11-03 09:24:27
To: 16955, Order: 193939, Start Time: 2013-11-03 05:16:28, End Time: 2013-11-03 07:07:33
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18
===============
Tests Summary
===============
Performance Regressions: 7 (18 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 4 (19 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1096 (1070 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108
===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler: 2.59% (0.6861 => 0.7039, std.dev.: 0.0049)
Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/fourinarow/fourinarow: 7.94% (0.4318 => 0.4661, std.dev.: 0.0099)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 6.09% (4.9795 => 5.2828, std.dev.: 0.0834)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.74% (4.5745 => 4.7914, std.dev.: 0.0650)
MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 2.66% (2.8625 => 2.9386, std.dev.: 0.0240)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.89% (3.1613 => 3.2211, std.dev.: 0.0070)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: 1.07% (49.7732 => 50.3059, std.dev.: 0.1128)
Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver/gemver: -7.12% (0.4005 => 0.3720, std.dev.: 0.0110)
MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: -5.54% (8.4698 => 8.0003, std.dev.: 0.1248)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: -4.38% (7.5170 => 7.1874, std.dev.: 0.0335)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: -1.08% (3.8980 => 3.8560, std.dev.: 0.0095)
Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.65% (0.1379 => 0.1388, std.dev.: 0.0424)
================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark: 14.17% (44.2807 => 50.5555, std.dev.: 2.1542)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler: 2.49% (0.6868 => 0.7039, std.dev.: 0.0049)
Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 60.89% (7.6426 => 12.2965, std.dev.: 0.0411)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 55.71% (4.4696 => 6.9597, std.dev.: 0.0556)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 45.92% (2.8554 => 4.1667, std.dev.: 0.0538)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 34.74% (4.2391 => 5.7119, std.dev.: 0.1175)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 31.26% (1.1431 => 1.5004, std.dev.: 0.0059)
MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc: 7.53% (0.1699 => 0.1827, std.dev.: 0.0033)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 6.88% (4.9428 => 5.2828, std.dev.: 0.0834)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 6.28% (3.1730 => 3.3723, std.dev.: 0.0438)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.74% (4.5744 => 4.7914, std.dev.: 0.0650)
MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 4.23% (2.8194 => 2.9386, std.dev.: 0.0240)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm: 3.39% (2.5368 => 2.6228, std.dev.: 0.0188)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.35% (89.7126 => 92.7197, std.dev.: 0.5245)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 3.08% (5.3716 => 5.5373, std.dev.: 0.0435)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 2.03% (3.1569 => 3.2211, std.dev.: 0.0070)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 1.90% (1.0477 => 1.0676, std.dev.: 0.0013)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.71% (8.5434 => 8.6894, std.dev.: 0.0522)
Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/casts: -19.69% (0.1483 => 0.1191, std.dev.: 0.0003)
Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -76.46% (57.2347 => 13.4744, std.dev.: 0.0430)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -54.96% (0.5226 => 0.2354, std.dev.: 0.0344)
MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -42.40% (1.5790 => 0.9095, std.dev.: 0.0020)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/mpeg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode: -30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0016)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -20.78% (4.0181 => 3.1831, std.dev.: 0.1469)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -18.40% (15.9508 => 13.0159, std.dev.: 0.3846)
MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -14.89% (3.7437 => 3.1863, std.dev.: 0.1220)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3: -14.67% (5.0002 => 4.2665, std.dev.: 0.0354)
SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -12.81% (20.8247 => 18.1574, std.dev.: 0.2485)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -10.44% (3.4956 => 3.1306, std.dev.: 0.0256)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: -9.33% (4.6972 => 4.2591, std.dev.: 0.0286)
MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -5.49% (8.1346 => 7.6881, std.dev.: 0.1037)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -3.92% (2.5938 => 2.4922, std.dev.: 0.0208)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -3.20% (3.7874 => 3.6663, std.dev.: 0.0127)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -2.73% (17.1431 => 16.6744, std.dev.: 0.0492)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: -2.48% (7.3703 => 7.1874, std.dev.: 0.0335)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -1.92% (4.3592 => 4.2756, std.dev.: 0.0141)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -1.81% (2.4471 => 2.4028, std.dev.: 0.0104)
Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 2.97% (0.1348 => 0.1388, std.dev.: 0.0424)
Report Time: 0.78s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131103/4b5cf4da/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-testresults
mailing list