[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/11902?compare_to=11899&baseline=11681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:13

Comparing:
     Run: 11902, Order: 182979, Start Time: 2013-05-31 02:38:00, End Time: 2013-05-31 04:25:19
      To: 11899, Order: 182974, Start Time: 2013-05-31 00:31:09, End Time: 2013-05-31 02:17:52
Baseline: 11681, Order: 182589, Start Time: 2013-05-23 16:35:30, End Time: 2013-05-23 18:25:16

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 10 (12 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 3 (29 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1094 (1066 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs: 57.92% (0.0202 => 0.0319, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst: 4.58% (0.2292 => 0.2397, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck: 3.92% (0.4231 => 0.4397, std.dev.: 0.0008)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: 26.21% (1.4756 => 1.8623, std.dev.: 0.0144)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 21.59% (0.0630 => 0.0766, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 13.65% (8.0510 => 9.1496, std.dev.: 0.0392)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 7.85% (4.6699 => 5.0365, std.dev.: 0.0138)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 4.01% (4.7360 => 4.9260, std.dev.: 0.0174)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-6: 4.00% (2.4350 => 2.5324, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 3.77% (9.5269 => 9.8862, std.dev.: 0.0118)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: -7.88% (2.5705 => 2.3679, std.dev.: 0.0673)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/fourinarow/fourinarow: -5.64% (0.4662 => 0.4399, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu: -1.80% (2.0373 => 2.0007, std.dev.: 0.0106)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.27% (0.1477 => 0.1481, std.dev.: 0.0020)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs: 55.61% (0.0205 => 0.0319, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 5.93% (0.2747 => 0.2910, std.dev.: 0.0056)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ: 4.32% (0.3429 => 0.3577, std.dev.: 0.0055)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck: 2.42% (0.4293 => 0.4397, std.dev.: 0.0008)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 21.01% (0.0633 => 0.0766, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 17.95% (1.1695 => 1.3794, std.dev.: 0.0345)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 5.91% (0.9806 => 1.0386, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 5.47% (1.2224 => 1.2893, std.dev.: 0.0157)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 5.01% (28.2496 => 29.6644, std.dev.: 0.5210)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-6: 4.00% (2.4350 => 2.5324, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.74% (8.3425 => 8.4875, std.dev.: 0.0194)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: 1.65% (40.6198 => 41.2888, std.dev.: 0.2015)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: -24.43% (0.2431 => 0.1837, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: -16.19% (0.0803 => 0.0673, std.dev.: 0.0013)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler: -12.74% (0.7918 => 0.6909, std.dev.: 0.0129)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie: -9.32% (0.8025 => 0.7277, std.dev.: 0.0196)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/bison/mybison: -9.02% (1.7804 => 1.6198, std.dev.: 0.0376)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: -8.85% (1.0314 => 0.9401, std.dev.: 0.0182)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_isamax: -8.77% (0.2006 => 0.1830, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -6.83% (1.3155 => 1.2257, std.dev.: 0.0335)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: -4.96% (0.2117 => 0.2012, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/analyzer/analyzer: -4.47% (0.2753 => 0.2630, std.dev.: 0.0031)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: -43.44% (1.2911 => 0.7303, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: -37.02% (0.2099 => 0.1322, std.dev.: 0.0197)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -25.56% (4.4050 => 3.2789, std.dev.: 0.0815)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: -21.68% (0.8606 => 0.6740, std.dev.: 0.0153)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: -19.19% (6.2328 => 5.0365, std.dev.: 0.0138)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -16.06% (25.3677 => 21.2934, std.dev.: 0.1887)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: -11.51% (10.3398 => 9.1496, std.dev.: 0.0392)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_expandfft: -8.29% (32.4581 => 29.7685, std.dev.: 0.6814)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -8.22% (48.3307 => 44.3582, std.dev.: 0.2854)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2: -6.63% (0.1945 => 0.1816, std.dev.: 0.0003)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: -5.99% (4.6358 => 4.3579, std.dev.: 0.0442)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: -5.30% (4.5717 => 4.3292, std.dev.: 0.0105)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -4.01% (3.5327 => 3.3912, std.dev.: 0.0451)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -3.95% (9.1099 => 8.7502, std.dev.: 0.0169)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp: -3.42% (1.6613 => 1.6045, std.dev.: 0.0071)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: -3.24% (10.2170 => 9.8862, std.dev.: 0.0118)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: -2.95% (5.7342 => 5.5652, std.dev.: 0.0287)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/llubenchmark/llu: -2.05% (2.0425 => 2.0007, std.dev.: 0.0106)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: -1.77% (0.6548 => 0.6432, std.dev.: 0.0038)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 2.78% (0.1441 => 0.1481, std.dev.: 0.0020)

Report Time: 0.64s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130530/3d337da9/attachment.html>