[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Tue May 28 18:51:38 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/11820?compare_to=11816&baseline=11681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:13

Comparing:
     Run: 11820, Order: 182811, Start Time: 2013-05-29 00:06:04, End Time: 2013-05-29 01:52:10
      To: 11816, Order: 182804, Start Time: 2013-05-28 21:56:35, End Time: 2013-05-28 23:42:52
Baseline: 11681, Order: 182589, Start Time: 2013-05-23 16:35:30, End Time: 2013-05-23 18:25:16

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 8 (12 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 2 (30 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1097 (1065 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.03% (0.3767 => 0.3881, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: 1.64% (1.0168 => 1.0335, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 1.48% (1.5835 => 1.6070, std.dev.: 0.0032)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: 15.60% (3.2029 => 3.7025, std.dev.: 0.0273)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/mvt/mvt: 12.34% (0.2625 => 0.2949, std.dev.: 0.0123)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 3.31% (9.5486 => 9.8648, std.dev.: 0.0215)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 2.78% (16.4291 => 16.8853, std.dev.: 0.0311)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: 1.20% (51.3586 => 51.9773, std.dev.: 0.1062)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-dbl/StatementReordering-dbl: -1.36% (1.6122 => 1.5902, std.dev.: 0.0076)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm: -2.34% (2.7744 => 2.7095, std.dev.: 0.0088)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -0.28% (0.1439 => 0.1435, std.dev.: 0.0020)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 3.08% (0.3765 => 0.3881, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 1.31% (1.5862 => 1.6070, std.dev.: 0.0032)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 11.17% (0.9806 => 1.0901, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: 5.42% (3.5120 => 3.7025, std.dev.: 0.0273)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram: 5.28% (1.2224 => 1.2869, std.dev.: 0.0139)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 4.19% (1.0571 => 1.1014, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 3.29% (2.8536 => 2.9474, std.dev.: 0.0274)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 2.54% (16.4665 => 16.8853, std.dev.: 0.0311)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 2.17% (8.3425 => 8.5232, std.dev.: 0.0314)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: 2.12% (1.3696 => 1.3987, std.dev.: 0.0102)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 1.53% (1.6851 => 1.7109, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 1.35% (88.2998 => 89.4934, std.dev.: 0.0981)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: -25.05% (0.2431 => 0.1822, std.dev.: 0.0108)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: -17.31% (0.0803 => 0.0664, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/netbench-crc/netbench-crc: -15.13% (0.1322 => 0.1122, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network-patricia: -11.35% (0.1075 => 0.0953, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/bison/mybison: -8.68% (1.7804 => 1.6258, std.dev.: 0.0527)
  MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha: -7.60% (0.1407 => 0.1300, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -6.61% (1.3155 => 1.2286, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: -4.98% (0.8649 => 0.8218, std.dev.: 0.0066)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler: -3.95% (0.4030 => 0.3871, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: -2.55% (0.4861 => 0.4737, std.dev.: 0.0018)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: -43.91% (1.2911 => 0.7242, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: -31.79% (1.3499 => 0.9208, std.dev.: 0.0445)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -26.55% (4.4050 => 3.2356, std.dev.: 0.2905)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: -19.18% (6.2328 => 5.0374, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -15.99% (25.3677 => 21.3105, std.dev.: 0.0632)
  MultiSource/Applications/minisat/minisat: -15.07% (7.3703 => 6.2599, std.dev.: 0.3425)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: -13.06% (10.3398 => 8.9890, std.dev.: 0.0456)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -11.84% (3.5327 => 3.1143, std.dev.: 0.0378)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: -8.21% (0.7941 => 0.7289, std.dev.: 0.0249)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -8.18% (48.3307 => 44.3763, std.dev.: 0.0699)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: -5.45% (4.5717 => 4.3225, std.dev.: 0.0090)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: -3.45% (10.2170 => 9.8648, std.dev.: 0.0215)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: -3.33% (0.6548 => 0.6330, std.dev.: 0.0009)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: -3.00% (4.6358 => 4.4969, std.dev.: 0.0486)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: -2.99% (7.1938 => 6.9785, std.dev.: 0.0447)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer: -2.65% (1.6679 => 1.6237, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: -2.34% (2.8537 => 2.7870, std.dev.: 0.0145)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/NPB-serial/is/is: -1.27% (12.1841 => 12.0299, std.dev.: 0.0551)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1: -1.19% (1.2579 => 1.2429, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi: -1.05% (2.2398 => 2.2162, std.dev.: 0.0076)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -0.42% (0.1441 => 0.1435, std.dev.: 0.0020)

Report Time: 0.65s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130528/4cedc8f6/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list