[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/11717?compare_to=11713&baseline=11681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:13

Comparing:
     Run: 11717, Order: 182653, Start Time: 2013-05-24 17:48:15, End Time: 2013-05-24 19:34:50
      To: 11713, Order: 182647, Start Time: 2013-05-24 15:42:54, End Time: 2013-05-24 17:27:49
Baseline: 11681, Order: 182589, Start Time: 2013-05-23 16:35:30, End Time: 2013-05-23 18:25:16

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 11 (7 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (35 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1096 (1065 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: 1.51% (1.4053 => 1.4265, std.dev.: 0.0029)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 16.75% (4.1368 => 4.8297, std.dev.: 0.0157)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver/gemver: 6.27% (0.2998 => 0.3186, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 4.85% (1.1206 => 1.1750, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 4.11% (4.7288 => 4.9233, std.dev.: 0.0148)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: 3.03% (20.8047 => 21.4341, std.dev.: 0.2348)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: 2.92% (1.3749 => 1.4150, std.dev.: 0.0050)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: 2.56% (5.7827 => 5.9309, std.dev.: 0.0092)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: 1.56% (4.0419 => 4.1048, std.dev.: 0.0184)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 1.40% (4.4646 => 4.5272, std.dev.: 0.0238)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 1.22% (10.2027 => 10.3267, std.dev.: 0.0048)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 9.69% (0.1404 => 0.1540, std.dev.: 0.0228)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 4.09% (1.0571 => 1.1003, std.dev.: 0.0053)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 4.07% (1.1291 => 1.1750, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: 3.31% (1.3696 => 1.4150, std.dev.: 0.0050)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 2.28% (8.3425 => 8.5330, std.dev.: 0.0242)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/covariance/covariance: 2.00% (3.9713 => 4.0507, std.dev.: 0.0090)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 1.25% (11.4990 => 11.6431, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: 1.03% (9.8728 => 9.9743, std.dev.: 0.0224)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: -25.92% (0.2431 => 0.1801, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: -16.31% (0.0803 => 0.0672, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/whetstone: -15.31% (0.1097 => 0.0929, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft: -12.58% (0.1646 => 0.1439, std.dev.: 0.0012)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-sha/security-sha: -12.25% (0.1151 => 0.1010, std.dev.: 0.0003)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network-patricia: -11.91% (0.1075 => 0.0947, std.dev.: 0.0010)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: -10.46% (1.5932 => 1.4265, std.dev.: 0.0029)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie: -10.01% (0.8025 => 0.7222, std.dev.: 0.0078)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: -9.81% (5.1587 => 4.6524, std.dev.: 0.0562)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-jpeg/consumer-jpeg: -8.53% (5.4314 => 4.9680, std.dev.: 0.1565)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: -8.07% (1.0314 => 0.9482, std.dev.: 0.0088)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-stringsearch/office-stringsearch: -6.79% (0.1886 => 0.1758, std.dev.: 0.0003)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: -6.71% (0.7381 => 0.6886, std.dev.: 0.0056)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/18-imp/imp: -6.62% (0.4199 => 0.3921, std.dev.: 0.0085)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: -6.14% (2.0439 => 1.9184, std.dev.: 0.0185)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des: -5.55% (0.3853 => 0.3639, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: -4.77% (0.2117 => 0.2016, std.dev.: 0.0007)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/analyzer/analyzer: -4.72% (0.2753 => 0.2623, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish: -4.65% (0.3378 => 0.3221, std.dev.: 0.0058)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2: -4.12% (0.2961 => 0.2839, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: -3.89% (10.1602 => 9.7645, std.dev.: 0.0787)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: -3.64% (7.7211 => 7.4399, std.dev.: 0.0616)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft: -2.22% (0.9957 => 0.9736, std.dev.: 0.0079)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: -37.21% (0.2099 => 0.1318, std.dev.: 0.0086)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: -21.82% (0.8606 => 0.6728, std.dev.: 0.0150)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: -9.34% (0.7941 => 0.7199, std.dev.: 0.0158)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2: -6.53% (0.1945 => 0.1818, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: -5.99% (2.4808 => 2.3323, std.dev.: 0.0229)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: -5.11% (2.5366 => 2.4069, std.dev.: 0.0287)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -4.98% (0.3513 => 0.3338, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp: -3.76% (1.6613 => 1.5988, std.dev.: 0.0075)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: -3.04% (4.2334 => 4.1048, std.dev.: 0.0184)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: -3.03% (5.7342 => 5.5602, std.dev.: 0.0245)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: -2.34% (4.6358 => 4.5272, std.dev.: 0.0238)
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: -1.28% (2.5688 => 2.5360, std.dev.: 0.0086)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 6.87% (0.1441 => 0.1540, std.dev.: 0.0228)

Report Time: 0.61s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130524/6c3cad8f/attachment.html>