[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Fri May 24 00:55:23 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/11701?compare_to=11697&baseline=11681
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:13

Comparing:
     Run: 11701, Order: 182629, Start Time: 2013-05-24 06:10:37, End Time: 2013-05-24 07:55:49
      To: 11697, Order: 182626, Start Time: 2013-05-24 01:23:12, End Time: 2013-05-24 03:08:17
Baseline: 11681, Order: 182589, Start Time: 2013-05-23 16:35:30, End Time: 2013-05-23 18:25:16

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 14 (5 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (40 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1093 (1062 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie: 2.35% (0.7096 => 0.7263, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: 1.99% (1.4847 => 1.5143, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: 1.50% (1.4002 => 1.4212, std.dev.: 0.0079)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo: 17.35% (4.1167 => 4.8310, std.dev.: 0.0160)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ft/ft: 15.03% (0.7494 => 0.8620, std.dev.: 0.0162)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 15.00% (13.9082 => 15.9942, std.dev.: 0.6522)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 9.33% (9.4481 => 10.3296, std.dev.: 0.0087)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 6.19% (9.5722 => 10.1651, std.dev.: 0.0193)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 5.67% (1.0462 => 1.1055, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 4.20% (2.3045 => 2.4012, std.dev.: 0.0176)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: 3.28% (0.6714 => 0.6934, std.dev.: 0.0058)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 2.71% (5.5588 => 5.7094, std.dev.: 0.0129)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: 2.62% (92.8080 => 95.2359, std.dev.: 0.4867)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 1.96% (11.3766 => 11.6000, std.dev.: 0.0260)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 3.89% (0.1415 => 0.1470, std.dev.: 0.0157)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 20.22% (0.0633 => 0.0761, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog: 4.58% (1.0571 => 1.1055, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 3.66% (2.3164 => 2.4012, std.dev.: 0.0176)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 2.21% (8.3425 => 8.5265, std.dev.: 0.0110)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/covariance/covariance: 2.10% (3.9713 => 4.0548, std.dev.: 0.0045)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: -16.69% (0.0803 => 0.0669, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler: -13.01% (0.7918 => 0.6888, std.dev.: 0.0058)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-sha/security-sha: -11.90% (0.1151 => 0.1014, std.dev.: 0.0010)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft: -11.42% (0.1646 => 0.1458, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: -10.80% (1.5932 => 1.4212, std.dev.: 0.0079)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/alti_isamax: -10.12% (0.2006 => 0.1803, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: -9.70% (5.1587 => 4.6583, std.dev.: 0.0420)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie: -9.50% (0.8025 => 0.7263, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: -8.78% (1.0314 => 0.9408, std.dev.: 0.0137)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-jpeg/consumer-jpeg: -8.48% (5.4314 => 4.9708, std.dev.: 0.0397)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-stringsearch/office-stringsearch: -7.53% (0.1886 => 0.1744, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: -7.13% (0.7381 => 0.6855, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: -6.29% (15.9860 => 14.9812, std.dev.: 0.2238)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: -5.40% (2.0439 => 1.9336, std.dev.: 0.0164)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/analyzer/analyzer: -5.09% (0.2753 => 0.2613, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: -4.76% (20.1855 => 19.2246, std.dev.: 0.1109)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des: -3.94% (0.3853 => 0.3701, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: -3.89% (1.3686 => 1.3153, std.dev.: 0.0055)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: -3.88% (7.7211 => 7.4214, std.dev.: 0.0514)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: -3.29% (10.1602 => 9.8264, std.dev.: 0.0286)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft: -2.22% (0.9957 => 0.9736, std.dev.: 0.0081)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: -36.87% (0.2099 => 0.1325, std.dev.: 0.0053)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: -19.43% (0.8606 => 0.6934, std.dev.: 0.0058)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ft/ft: -15.91% (1.0251 => 0.8620, std.dev.: 0.0162)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/analyzer/analyzer: -14.13% (0.0920 => 0.0790, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark: -11.03% (10.2418 => 9.1119, std.dev.: 0.2625)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: -9.42% (0.7941 => 0.7193, std.dev.: 0.0286)
  MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS: -7.95% (8.8720 => 8.1666, std.dev.: 0.2674)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trmm/trmm: -7.13% (3.2030 => 2.9746, std.dev.: 0.0120)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: -6.87% (3.5120 => 3.2708, std.dev.: 0.0711)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2: -6.63% (0.1945 => 0.1816, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones/fhourstones: -6.38% (1.3530 => 1.2667, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest: -5.76% (0.4480 => 0.4222, std.dev.: 0.0097)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -5.41% (0.3513 => 0.3323, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/distray/distray: -5.32% (0.2332 => 0.2208, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: -5.24% (2.5366 => 2.4038, std.dev.: 0.0494)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: -2.89% (2.8537 => 2.7713, std.dev.: 0.0063)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp: -2.68% (1.6613 => 1.6168, std.dev.: 0.0009)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1: -1.96% (1.2579 => 1.2333, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: -1.24% (2.5408 => 2.5094, std.dev.: 0.0013)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 2.01% (0.1441 => 0.1470, std.dev.: 0.0157)

Report Time: 1.12s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130524/c5c4c2a2/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list