[llvm-testresults] pollyperf5__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Thu Dec 26 12:19:03 PST 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/19073?compare_to=19039&baseline=18572
Nickname: pollyperf5__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:29

Comparing:
     Run: 19073, Order: 198047, Start Time: 2013-12-26 15:35:44, End Time: 2013-12-26 20:23:30
      To: 19039, Order: 198028, Start Time: 2013-12-26 00:10:01, End Time: 2013-12-26 04:58:26
Baseline: 18572, Order: 197554, Start Time: 2013-12-18 09:58:50, End Time: 2013-12-18 15:09:11

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 16 (18 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (5 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1094 (1087 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/nsieve-bits: 66.67% (0.0240 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode: 44.44% (0.0360 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel: 40.00% (0.0400 => 0.0560, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/mvt/mvt: 25.00% (0.0640 => 0.0800, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft: 21.87% (0.1280 => 0.1560, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees: 20.00% (0.0800 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: 14.29% (0.0840 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop: 9.43% (0.2120 => 0.2320, std.dev.: 0.0071)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/ocean/ocean: 9.38% (0.1280 => 0.1400, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer: 8.33% (0.1440 => 0.1560, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol: 6.56% (0.2440 => 0.2600, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: 2.58% (0.9320 => 0.9560, std.dev.: 0.0092)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: 1.80% (1.1081 => 1.1281, std.dev.: 0.0071)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: 1.64% (1.2201 => 1.2401, std.dev.: 0.0074)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemver/gemver: 5.43% (0.3680 => 0.3880, std.dev.: 0.0077)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 35.71% (0.0560 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/IntMM: 30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel: 27.27% (0.0440 => 0.0560, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput: 26.67% (0.0600 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/n-body: 15.79% (0.0760 => 0.0880, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: 7.55% (0.4240 => 0.4560, std.dev.: 0.0092)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol: 6.56% (0.2440 => 0.2600, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2: 6.12% (0.1960 => 0.2080, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: 5.45% (0.2200 => 0.2320, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sieve: 4.94% (0.3240 => 0.3400, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile: 4.04% (0.3960 => 0.4120, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: 3.82% (0.5240 => 0.5440, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: 2.75% (0.4360 => 0.4480, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-dbl/StatementReordering-dbl: 2.50% (1.1201 => 1.1481, std.dev.: 0.0057)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones/fhourstones: 2.95% (1.0841 => 1.1161, std.dev.: 0.0099)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 2.65% (0.6040 => 0.6200, std.dev.: 0.0056)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 1.04% (2.3121 => 2.3361, std.dev.: 0.0032)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -63.30% (46.6069 => 17.1051, std.dev.: 10.3568)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: -62.14% (130.3441 => 49.3511, std.dev.: 28.6168)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -61.78% (87.0734 => 33.2781, std.dev.: 19.9312)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -22.84% (3.1002 => 2.3921, std.dev.: 0.1064)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: -20.18% (37.0343 => 29.5618, std.dev.: 0.7963)

Report Time: 3.25s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131226/3fbc8005/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list