[llvm-testresults] pollyperf3__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Wed Dec 25 07:59:57 PST 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/19014?compare_to=18989&baseline=18569
Nickname: pollyperf3__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:26

Comparing:
     Run: 19014, Order: 198011, Start Time: 2013-12-25 11:16:28, End Time: 2013-12-25 16:04:22
      To: 18989, Order: 197992, Start Time: 2013-12-25 01:46:04, End Time: 2013-12-25 06:33:47
Baseline: 18569, Order: 197553, Start Time: 2013-12-18 09:17:34, End Time: 2013-12-18 14:27:44

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 12 (20 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (6 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1098 (1084 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: 26.67% (0.0600 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/bicg/bicg: 23.53% (0.0680 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse_isamax: 14.29% (0.0840 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0041)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8: 9.09% (0.1320 => 0.1440, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 2.25% (4.7920 => 4.9000, std.dev.: 0.0303)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: 1.47% (1.3561 => 1.3761, std.dev.: 0.0048)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/08-main/main: 27.27% (0.0440 => 0.0560, std.dev.: 0.0020)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/durbin/durbin: 7.96% (0.4520 => 0.4880, std.dev.: 0.0104)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 5.00% (0.2400 => 0.2520, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 1.21% (2.3081 => 2.3361, std.dev.: 0.0068)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl: 400.00% (0.0040 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0022)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/family/family: 33.33% (0.0360 => 0.0480, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort: 26.67% (0.0600 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sieve: 9.21% (0.3040 => 0.3320, std.dev.: 0.0076)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8: 9.09% (0.1320 => 0.1440, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-apml/fdtd-apml: 8.82% (0.1360 => 0.1480, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: 6.81% (10.3446 => 11.0487, std.dev.: 0.1111)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol: 6.67% (0.2400 => 0.2560, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary2: 4.17% (0.2880 => 0.3000, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 3.73% (0.9640 => 1.0000, std.dev.: 0.0112)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm: 3.51% (1.3680 => 1.4160, std.dev.: 0.0159)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 3.30% (1.6960 => 1.7520, std.dev.: 0.0204)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-dbl/LoopRestructuring-dbl: 3.03% (1.1881 => 1.2241, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 2.31% (1.2121 => 1.2401, std.dev.: 0.0055)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 1.91% (1.2561 => 1.2801, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib: 1.68% (0.7160 => 0.7280, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.51% (17.2162 => 17.4762, std.dev.: 0.0398)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: 1.47% (1.3561 => 1.3761, std.dev.: 0.0048)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: -64.52% (139.6807 => 49.5631, std.dev.: 28.9466)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -63.28% (89.9296 => 33.0221, std.dev.: 20.1728)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -60.22% (43.2667 => 17.2131, std.dev.: 10.0751)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -24.78% (3.1642 => 2.3801, std.dev.: 0.1034)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: -22.26% (37.3983 => 29.0738, std.dev.: 0.5053)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm: -1.14% (2.4522 => 2.4242, std.dev.: 0.0108)

Report Time: 1.99s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131225/4f2c75e0/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list