[llvm-testresults] pollyperf14__pollyperf-O3-polly-detect__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Fri Dec 20 12:53:13 PST 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/18736?compare_to=18690&baseline=18571
Nickname: pollyperf14__pollyperf-O3-polly-detect__clang_DEV__x86_64:28

Comparing:
     Run: 18736, Order: 197814, Start Time: 2013-12-20 15:59:59, End Time: 2013-12-20 20:57:32
      To: 18690, Order: 197765, Start Time: 2013-12-20 02:28:13, End Time: 2013-12-20 07:26:29
Baseline: 18571, Order: 197553, Start Time: 2013-12-18 09:16:57, End Time: 2013-12-18 14:35:04

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 18 (14 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 1 (6 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1091 (1090 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-10-SignConversions: 400.00% (0.0040 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-02-DependentPHI: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice: 100.00% (0.0160 => 0.0320, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/AtomicOps: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Perm: 80.00% (0.0200 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d: 66.67% (0.0240 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/queens: 33.33% (0.0480 => 0.0640, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Oscar: 23.53% (0.0680 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: 18.18% (0.0880 => 0.1040, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest: 17.39% (0.0920 => 0.1080, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/bicg/bicg: 15.79% (0.0760 => 0.0880, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes: 8.97% (0.3120 => 0.3400, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random: 8.77% (0.2280 => 0.2480, std.dev.: 0.0049)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol: 6.45% (0.2480 => 0.2640, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd: 2.98% (1.7440 => 1.7960, std.dev.: 0.0142)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi/voronoi: 14.06% (0.2560 => 0.2920, std.dev.: 0.0108)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/17-bintr/bintr: 13.04% (0.0920 => 0.1040, std.dev.: 0.0020)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl: -2.36% (1.1841 => 1.1561, std.dev.: 0.0090)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitializers: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-VarSizeArray: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-10-SignConversions: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Oscar: 16.67% (0.0720 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol: 10.00% (0.2400 => 0.2640, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 7.14% (0.2240 => 0.2400, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3: 6.94% (0.2880 => 0.3080, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office: 6.56% (0.2440 => 0.2600, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd: 5.40% (1.7040 => 1.7960, std.dev.: 0.0142)
  MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 2.77% (1.1560 => 1.1880, std.dev.: 0.0123)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: 2.37% (1.1801 => 1.2081, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 2.08% (1.1521 => 1.1761, std.dev.: 0.0080)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 1.30% (1.2281 => 1.2441, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 1.26% (9.5162 => 9.6362, std.dev.: 0.0279)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -65.81% (97.4941 => 33.3341, std.dev.: 13.3425)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: -65.77% (145.2571 => 49.7191, std.dev.: 19.2735)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -62.54% (46.2869 => 17.3411, std.dev.: 6.8031)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -28.73% (3.3282 => 2.3721, std.dev.: 0.1050)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm/symm: -24.00% (38.3664 => 29.1578, std.dev.: 2.4044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa: -1.82% (1.3201 => 1.2961, std.dev.: 0.0073)

Report Time: 2.15s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131220/1ba2dc19/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list