[llvm-testresults] pollyperf3__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Wed Dec 18 11:39:40 PST 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/18585?compare_to=18569&baseline=18569
Nickname: pollyperf3__pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:26

Comparing:
     Run: 18585, Order: 197570, Start Time: 2013-12-18 14:44:58, End Time: 2013-12-18 19:43:59
      To: 18569, Order: 197553, Start Time: 2013-12-18 09:17:34, End Time: 2013-12-18 14:27:44
Baseline: 18569, Order: 197553, Start Time: 2013-12-18 09:17:34, End Time: 2013-12-18 14:27:44

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 18 (18 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 4 (4 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1088 (1088 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 66.67% (0.0240 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 23.53% (0.0680 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: 23.08% (0.0520 => 0.0640, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: 20.00% (0.0800 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 18.75% (0.0640 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: 17.39% (0.0920 => 0.1080, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/medley/reg_detect/reg_detect: 8.57% (0.1400 => 0.1520, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer: 8.11% (0.1480 => 0.1600, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: 6.03% (10.3446 => 10.9687, std.dev.: 0.1107)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile: 4.12% (0.3880 => 0.4040, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2: 4.00% (0.3000 => 0.3120, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 3.10% (0.5160 => 0.5320, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 2.23% (1.2561 => 1.2841, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: 1.97% (1.2201 => 1.2441, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.91% (1.2561 => 1.2801, std.dev.: 0.0084)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/strcat: 11.76% (0.1360 => 0.1520, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/distray/distray: 7.89% (0.1520 => 0.1640, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 1.03% (5.0323 => 5.0843, std.dev.: 0.0138)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -62.57% (89.9296 => 33.6581, std.dev.: 16.3301)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -59.50% (43.2667 => 17.5211, std.dev.: 8.6824)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: -44.75% (139.6807 => 77.1688, std.dev.: 17.1282)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -18.71% (3.1642 => 2.5722, std.dev.: 0.1865)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 66.67% (0.0240 => 0.0400, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 23.53% (0.0680 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle: 23.08% (0.0520 => 0.0640, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: 20.00% (0.0800 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 18.75% (0.0640 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: 17.39% (0.0920 => 0.1080, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/medley/reg_detect/reg_detect: 8.57% (0.1400 => 0.1520, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer: 8.11% (0.1480 => 0.1600, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: 6.03% (10.3446 => 10.9687, std.dev.: 0.1107)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile: 4.12% (0.3880 => 0.4040, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2: 4.00% (0.3000 => 0.3120, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 3.10% (0.5160 => 0.5320, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: 2.23% (1.2561 => 1.2841, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-dbl/ControlLoops-dbl: 1.97% (1.2201 => 1.2441, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.91% (1.2561 => 1.2801, std.dev.: 0.0084)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/strcat: 11.76% (0.1360 => 0.1520, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/distray/distray: 7.89% (0.1520 => 0.1640, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 1.03% (5.0323 => 5.0843, std.dev.: 0.0138)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/2mm/2mm: -62.57% (89.9296 => 33.6581, std.dev.: 16.3301)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/gemm/gemm: -59.50% (43.2667 => 17.5211, std.dev.: 8.6824)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/3mm/3mm: -44.75% (139.6807 => 77.1688, std.dev.: 17.1282)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -18.71% (3.1642 => 2.5722, std.dev.: 0.1865)

Report Time: 0.46s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131218/f35d58a8/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list