[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/18439?compare_to=18437&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 18439, Order: 197335, Start Time: 2013-12-15 10:41:28, End Time: 2013-12-15 12:25:16
      To: 18437, Order: 197332, Start Time: 2013-12-15 02:13:33, End Time: 2013-12-15 03:53:25
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 18 (23 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 2 (18 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1090 (1069 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/04-bisect/bisect: 8.13% (0.1329 => 0.1437, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: 1.23% (1.2727 => 1.2884, std.dev.: 0.0017)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: 31.71% (0.3993 => 0.5259, std.dev.: 0.0354)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 16.46% (1.8115 => 2.1097, std.dev.: 0.0007)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 9.43% (14.0850 => 15.4127, std.dev.: 0.2597)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 8.22% (1.1031 => 1.1938, std.dev.: 0.0135)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 7.66% (0.3814 => 0.4106, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: 5.84% (0.7036 => 0.7447, std.dev.: 0.0002)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 5.53% (29.3817 => 31.0061, std.dev.: 0.2896)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 4.24% (7.1992 => 7.5044, std.dev.: 0.0083)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: 2.99% (5.1539 => 5.3079, std.dev.: 0.0465)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 2.59% (7.6820 => 7.8808, std.dev.: 0.0105)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: 2.34% (2.8821 => 2.9494, std.dev.: 0.0072)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2: 1.98% (3.5752 => 3.6459, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 1.86% (7.8477 => 7.9936, std.dev.: 0.0132)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.59% (8.5608 => 8.6965, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/jacobi-2d-imper/jacobi-2d-imper: 1.51% (1.5758 => 1.5996, std.dev.: 0.0063)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3: 1.33% (4.7451 => 4.8080, std.dev.: 0.0206)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/recursive: -2.36% (2.3370 => 2.2819, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: -1.53% (5.1726 => 5.0934, std.dev.: 0.0256)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 39.88% (15.7419 => 22.0204, std.dev.: 0.7267)
  MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 9.02% (1.2200 => 1.3300, std.dev.: 0.0258)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib: 2.93% (0.6412 => 0.6600, std.dev.: 0.0042)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/pi: 56.46% (1.6685 => 2.6106, std.dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: 40.71% (2.8607 => 4.0254, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: 24.62% (0.4220 => 0.5259, std.dev.: 0.0354)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/sieve: 20.58% (6.7454 => 8.1335, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 17.47% (1.7960 => 2.1097, std.dev.: 0.0007)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 16.16% (5.9583 => 6.9212, std.dev.: 0.1505)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 8.34% (1.1019 => 1.1938, std.dev.: 0.0135)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 7.83% (3.3810 => 3.6458, std.dev.: 0.0117)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle: 7.55% (0.1668 => 0.1794, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 7.31% (6.9930 => 7.5044, std.dev.: 0.0083)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 6.65% (7.3892 => 7.8808, std.dev.: 0.0105)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 6.42% (29.1357 => 31.0061, std.dev.: 0.2896)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 5.61% (0.6261 => 0.6612, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM: 4.12% (0.6939 => 0.7225, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3: 2.74% (4.6797 => 4.8080, std.dev.: 0.0206)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft: 2.14% (3.6501 => 3.7282, std.dev.: 0.0010)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.86% (11.7894 => 12.0088, std.dev.: 0.0264)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/jacobi-2d-imper/jacobi-2d-imper: 1.26% (1.5797 => 1.5996, std.dev.: 0.0063)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-2d/fdtd-2d: 1.15% (4.4509 => 4.5019, std.dev.: 0.0085)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: 1.11% (4.9365 => 4.9915, std.dev.: 0.0137)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: -9.85% (36.6274 => 33.0189, std.dev.: 1.2318)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-sha/security-sha: -9.74% (0.1088 => 0.0982, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: -7.83% (0.6882 => 0.6343, std.dev.: 0.0136)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: -7.59% (5.8749 => 5.4290, std.dev.: 0.0913)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: -4.92% (1.2914 => 1.2278, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: -4.87% (1.4113 => 1.3426, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -4.60% (1.3505 => 1.2884, std.dev.: 0.0017)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl: -4.16% (1.4125 => 1.3537, std.dev.: 0.0147)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: -4.06% (1.5305 => 1.4684, std.dev.: 0.0134)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-dbl/Symbolics-dbl: -4.02% (1.3127 => 1.2599, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: -3.58% (1.3264 => 1.2789, std.dev.: 0.0051)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: -3.43% (1.2724 => 1.2287, std.dev.: 0.0103)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: -2.87% (1.3024 => 1.2650, std.dev.: 0.0090)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: -2.58% (9.2178 => 8.9803, std.dev.: 0.0865)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: -6.20% (7.4226 => 6.9626, std.dev.: 0.0472)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/recursive: -2.30% (2.3355 => 2.2819, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: -1.85% (5.1896 => 5.0934, std.dev.: 0.0256)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: -1.11% (4.1462 => 4.1003, std.dev.: 0.0041)

Report Time: 0.77s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131215/6dafad58/attachment.html>