[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/18052?compare_to=18047&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 18052, Order: 196568, Start Time: 2013-12-06 09:34:55, End Time: 2013-12-06 11:21:35
      To: 18047, Order: 196565, Start Time: 2013-12-06 07:12:46, End Time: 2013-12-06 08:52:26
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 21 (24 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 6 (9 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1083 (1077 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/2008-01-29-ParamAliasesReturn: 73.76% (0.0202 => 0.0351, std.dev.: 0.0010)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc: 69.66% (0.0323 => 0.0548, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 64.43% (0.0402 => 0.0661, std.dev.: 0.0029)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-05-CastFPToUint: 63.64% (0.0209 => 0.0342, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs: 58.85% (0.0192 => 0.0305, std.dev.: 0.0022)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 58.60% (0.0186 => 0.0295, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-14-AtExit: 58.46% (0.0195 => 0.0309, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/compare: 49.12% (0.0226 => 0.0337, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose: 48.30% (0.0265 => 0.0393, std.dev.: 0.0029)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs: 41.76% (0.0273 => 0.0387, std.dev.: 0.0040)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: 37.42% (1.5451 => 2.1233, std.dev.: 0.1350)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 35.50% (4.5554 => 6.1726, std.dev.: 0.3221)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: 31.20% (2.8539 => 3.7442, std.dev.: 0.0843)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: 26.21% (1.4805 => 1.8686, std.dev.: 0.0116)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: 23.71% (4.6763 => 5.7850, std.dev.: 0.2690)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle: 8.28% (0.1643 => 0.1779, std.dev.: 0.0029)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: 6.68% (2.2660 => 2.4173, std.dev.: 0.0079)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 4.80% (7.1509 => 7.4943, std.dev.: 0.0269)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: 4.79% (0.7021 => 0.7357, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: 1.56% (2.6283 => 2.6693, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: 1.32% (4.9259 => 4.9908, std.dev.: 0.0026)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: -27.85% (4.0193 => 2.8999, std.dev.: 0.3597)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon: -12.25% (9.7783 => 8.5806, std.dev.: 0.0923)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: -9.82% (8.6285 => 7.7813, std.dev.: 0.1979)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: -4.06% (7.7313 => 7.4177, std.dev.: 0.0947)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -1.93% (2.5365 => 2.4875, std.dev.: 0.0180)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -1.77% (3.1974 => 3.1408, std.dev.: 0.0169)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/2008-01-29-ParamAliasesReturn: 72.06% (0.0204 => 0.0351, std.dev.: 0.0010)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 64.43% (0.0402 => 0.0661, std.dev.: 0.0029)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-05-CastFPToUint: 64.42% (0.0208 => 0.0342, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs: 58.03% (0.0193 => 0.0305, std.dev.: 0.0022)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc: 57.47% (0.0348 => 0.0548, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-14-AtExit: 51.47% (0.0204 => 0.0309, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/compare: 48.46% (0.0227 => 0.0337, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose: 45.56% (0.0270 => 0.0393, std.dev.: 0.0029)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: 44.29% (1.4716 => 2.1233, std.dev.: 0.1350)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: 34.86% (4.5769 => 6.1726, std.dev.: 0.3221)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: 26.96% (2.9492 => 3.7442, std.dev.: 0.0843)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-CRC32/telecomm-CRC32: 26.30% (1.4795 => 1.8686, std.dev.: 0.0116)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3: 25.82% (4.5977 => 5.7850, std.dev.: 0.2690)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 7.17% (6.9930 => 7.4943, std.dev.: 0.0269)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle: 6.65% (0.1668 => 0.1779, std.dev.: 0.0029)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: 4.90% (2.3043 => 2.4173, std.dev.: 0.0079)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 3.74% (0.6261 => 0.6495, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 3.48% (5.9126 => 6.1185, std.dev.: 0.0251)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/FloatMM: 3.46% (0.6939 => 0.7179, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4: 3.11% (0.5112 => 0.5271, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: 2.18% (5.2486 => 5.3629, std.dev.: 0.0315)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/life/life: 2.13% (2.5025 => 2.5559, std.dev.: 0.0127)
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: 1.24% (2.6366 => 2.6693, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: 1.10% (4.9365 => 4.9908, std.dev.: 0.0026)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: -4.62% (1.3146 => 1.2539, std.dev.: 0.0189)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-dbl/Reductions-dbl: -4.54% (1.4277 => 1.3629, std.dev.: 0.0029)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl: -4.01% (1.3157 => 1.2629, std.dev.: 0.0127)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt: -3.80% (1.2724 => 1.2240, std.dev.: 0.0105)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: -3.50% (1.3702 => 1.3223, std.dev.: 0.0055)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: -3.42% (1.2544 => 1.2115, std.dev.: 0.0085)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-dbl/Packing-dbl: -2.61% (1.2583 => 1.2255, std.dev.: 0.0068)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: -2.43% (1.3068 => 1.2751, std.dev.: 0.0098)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes: -2.78% (0.8636 => 0.8396, std.dev.: 0.0025)

Report Time: 2.02s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20131206/588c658e/attachment.html>