[llvm-testresults] lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Fri Jun 29 22:04:49 PDT 2012


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1662?compare_to=1658&baseline=999
Nickname: lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64:3
Comparing:
     Run: 1662, Order: 159479, Start Time: 2012-06-30 02:50:52, End Time: 2012-06-30 05:06:27
      To: 1658, Order: 159474, Start Time: 2012-06-30 00:08:07, End Time: 2012-06-30 02:23:41
Baseline: 999, Order: 158324, Start Time: 2012-06-11 20:29:30, End Time: 2012-06-11 22:44:50

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 0 (28 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (2 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 894 (864 on baseline)
Total Tests: 894

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================
================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================
Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/block-byref-aggr: 21.68% (0.3792 => 0.4614, std. dev.: 0.0099)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-2: 7.31% (0.3446 => 0.3698, std. dev.: 0.0000)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/for-in: 7.27% (0.3496 => 0.3750, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-4: 7.24% (0.3465 => 0.3716, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/instance-method-metadata: 7.22% (0.3488 => 0.3740, std. dev.: 0.0010)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/synchronized: 7.15% (0.3469 => 0.3717, std. dev.: 0.0001)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/trivial-interface: 7.15% (0.3442 => 0.3688, std. dev.: 0.0004)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-3: 7.14% (0.3460 => 0.3707, std. dev.: 0.0004)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions: 7.03% (0.3643 => 0.3899, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/property: 6.85% (0.3650 => 0.3900, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/parameter-passing: 6.66% (0.3724 => 0.3972, std. dev.: 0.0001)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/Hello: 4.48% (0.5826 => 0.6087, std. dev.: 0.0000)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/property-reference-object: 4.18% (0.5889 => 0.6135, std. dev.: 0.0057)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC++/property-reference: 3.33% (0.7171 => 0.7410, std. dev.: 0.0011)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms: 2.63% (0.5900 => 0.6055, std. dev.: 0.0012)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: 2.61% (0.5026 => 0.5157, std. dev.: 0.0019)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 2.58% (1.6211 => 1.6630, std. dev.: 0.0026)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 2.51% (0.4029 => 0.4130, std. dev.: 0.0002)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: 2.32% (3.5627 => 3.6452, std. dev.: 0.0004)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: 2.29% (0.4361 => 0.4461, std. dev.: 0.0000)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 2.04% (2.0673 => 2.1094, std. dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 1.93% (0.9909 => 1.0100, std. dev.: 0.0017)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame: 1.87% (1.3152 => 1.3398, std. dev.: 0.0008)
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.79% (4.2109 => 4.2863, std. dev.: 0.0009)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-jpeg/consumer-jpeg: 1.31% (1.9694 => 1.9952, std. dev.: 0.0017)
  MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd: 1.29% (0.9697 => 0.9822, std. dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg: 1.23% (1.9966 => 2.0212, std. dev.: 0.0070)
  MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser: 1.01% (1.0781 => 1.0890, std. dev.: 0.0015)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool: -3.84% (2.4764 => 2.3812, std. dev.: 0.0309)
  MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: -2.68% (11.9555 => 11.6351, std. dev.: 0.0061)

Report Time: 1.96s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20120630/cd6c6cc3/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list