[llvm-testresults] buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-arm-linux
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
stoklund at 2pi.dk
Tue Mar 8 16:48:01 PST 2011
On Mar 8, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Does anybody recognize this?
>>>>
>>>> ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll' FAILED ********************Script:
>>>> --
>>>> /wd/buildbot/llvm-arm-linux/llvm/Debug+Asserts/bin/llc < /wd/buildbot/llvm-arm-linux/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll -mtriple=i386-apple-darwin | grep pcmpeqd | /wd/buildbot/llvm-arm-linux/llvm/Debug+Asserts/bin/count 1
>>>> /wd/buildbot/llvm-arm-linux/llvm/Debug+Asserts/bin/llc < /wd/buildbot/llvm-arm-linux/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin | grep pcmpeqd | /wd/buildbot/llvm-arm-linux/llvm/Debug+Asserts/bin/count 1
>>>> --
>>>> Exit Code: 1
>>>> Command Output (stderr):
>>>> --
>>>> llc: SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp:3149: void llvm::SelectionDAGBuilder::visitTargetIntrinsic(const llvm::CallInst&, unsigned int): Assertion `TLI.isTypeLegal(Op.getValueType()) && "Intrinsic uses a non-legal type?"' failed.
>>>> 0 llc 0x011d21bc
>>>> 1 llc 0x011d2b44
>>>> 2 libc.so.6 0x4021cc10 __default_sa_restorer_v2 + 0
>>>> Stack dump:
>>>> 0. Program arguments: /wd/buildbot/llvm-arm-linux/llvm/Debug+Asserts/bin/llc -mtriple=i386-apple-darwin
>>>> 1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '<stdin>'.
>>>> 2. Running pass 'X86 DAG->DAG Instruction Selection' on function '@program_1'
>>>> Expected 1 lines, got 0.
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ********************
>>>
>>> Might be Andy and I. Very odd since I haven't seen it on anything else. Miscompile on the arm side maybe?
>>
>> We don't have a lot of non-x86 hosts. Could it be confusing target and host somehow?
>>
>> A miscompilation is also possible, but the builder is not bootstrapping, though.
>
> So this is still failing, but heck if I know why. Does anyone have a login to the bot?
It belongs to Xerxes.
For reference, the first failing build is here: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/589
I don't think any of those commits look like good candidates, but it is failing consistently.
/jakob
More information about the llvm-testresults
mailing list