[llvm-testresults] buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-gcc-x86_64-linux-selfhost
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Sun Jan 9 23:37:41 PST 2011
On Jan 9, 2011, at 9:43 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
> That didn't seem to help. :(
I've disabled all of the commits that were included in this build:
http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-gcc-i386-linux-selfhost/builds/554
Still no go. I'm pretty sure that the current part is a Jakob issue. The llvm-gcc-i386-linux-selfhost has been consistently failing. Here's the series of events as I see it:
Build 554: has r123086,7,9. These introduce a build failure causing an assertion:
Assertion `isa<X>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"' failed.
Build 555: has 90,91. These fix the build failure, but there is still a miscompile. With the miscompile I get a *stage 2* miscomparison of sched-vis.o
Build 556: Has a strongphi patch, a clang patch, and a bunch of Jakob patches. With these patches we still have a sched-vis.o miscompare, but now it is in *stage 1*, which is earlier.
Build 582 and other recent ones: I've disabled the patches from r123086,7,9 because I assume that they either include or expose a latent miscompile that the fixes in 555 weren't enough to cover for. Despite that, we still have the sched-vis.o in *stage 1*.
Jakob, are you sure that none of the patches in 556 could have caused an issue? While I agree that there is weirdness on some builders, the llvm-gcc-i386-linux-selfhost builder has been really consistent.
-Chris
>
> Evan
>
> On Jan 9, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 9, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 9, 2011, at 3:16 PM, buildbot at google1.osuosl.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-gcc-x86_64-linux-selfhost on llvm.
>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-gcc-x86_64-linux-selfhost/builds/372
>>>>
>>>> Buildbot URL: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/
>>>>
>>>> Buildslave for this Build: osu7
>>>>
>>>> Build Reason:
>>>> Build Source Stamp: 123130
>>>> Blamelist: chandlerc,lattner,stoklund
>>>>
>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile.llvm-gcc.stage1
>>>
>>> This is still the bootstrap comparison failure, I think there is still some non-stable code generation somewhere.
>>>
>>> None of the patches in this build should have any functional change.
>>>
>>> I'll be watching this builder.
>>
>> r123144 disabled part of the memset formation stuff. Lets see if that helps. All of this depends on alias analysis etc, so latent bugs can definitely be exposed...
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-testresults mailing list
>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
More information about the llvm-testresults
mailing list