[llvm-testresults] buildbot failure in smooshlab on llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9

Jakob Stoklund Olesen stoklund at 2pi.dk
Fri Feb 26 14:34:06 PST 2010 

On Feb 26, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:

> I can reproduce this now. Looking.

I wonder if r97262 has fixed this issue. PPC could accidentally store a f32 to a f64 spill slot, so floating point could definitely get badly corrupted. I don't think it was possible to store a f64 to a f32 spill slot. That would be catastrophic, overwriting the neighboring slot.

> 
> Evan
> 
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> 
>> Ok!
>> 
>> It's unfortunate that "self-host" isn't very meaningful...
>> 
>> - Daniel
>> 
>> On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>> I just did a successful self-host with my patch re-applied.
>>>> 
>>>> Just a reminder, its more than a self-host, the failure was in the
>>>> second llvm-gcc build. You would need to do
>>>> llvm -> llvm-gcc -> llvm -> llvm-gcc
>>>> to even possibly replicate the problem.
>>> 
>>> I know, I did this sequence 3 times already.
>>> 
>>> Evan
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> - Daniel
>>>> 
>>>>> Evan
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Stuart Hastings <stuart at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just a reminder, this isn't a simple bootstrap, it is failing in the stage2
>>>>>>> llm-gcc compile. My guess is the first LLVM-gcc is miscompiling the second
>>>>>>> stage LLVM. That won't show up in a normal LLVM-gcc bootstrap.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have an llvmgcc bootstrap of r97011 running right now on smoosh-14.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A straightforward FSF-style bootstrap of llvm-gcc at revision 97011 worked
>>>>>>> O.K.  It looks like I'll need to duplicate the build-install-build procedure
>>>>>>> used by the buildbot scripts.
>>>>>>> Daniel, is it feasible to run the buildbot script by hand in a directory of
>>>>>>> my own choosing?  If not, I think I can duplicate it by scanning the logs...
>>>>>>> stuart
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No, but its pretty straightforward, just do another configure and make
>>>>>> of llvm using the built llvm-gcc, then another llvm-gcc with the
>>>>>> second llvm and using the first llvm-gcc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And yes, you can see what it is doing by checking the first two lines
>>>>>> of the logs, the first line is the command that is run, the second is
>>>>>> the directory it ran it in.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> stuart
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Well, I can't reproduce on my machine. My ppc machine self-hosted fine last
>>>>>>> night. I think there is something else going on. Stuart, Dale, can one of
>>>>>>> you guys reproduce this look at this a bit? Is it llvmCore being miscompiled
>>>>>>> or llvmgcc42? Please get me a test case if that's possible. Thanks.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dan, can you audit my patch carefully? Thanks.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Evan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 10:49 AMPST, Bob Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The ppc buildbot just turned green (with 97011 reverted).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yep.  I'm satisfied that was it.  Thanks Daniel.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 9:34 AMPST, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:47 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I saw this on x86 last night. Then it disappeared. I am moving tomorrow so I
>>>>>>> can't deal with it. Dale, could you help? Thanks.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ok, I'm going to try another speculative revert of r97011 then.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You are not understanding me. I saw this assertion on x86 the night before.
>>>>>>> It was well before I commit the patch.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You may have, but the x86 buildbots are not failing.  The ppc buildbots
>>>>>>> (both) are failing consistently, and logs indicate the breakage was between
>>>>>>> 97006 and 97012.   I suppose it could be nondeterminism but the observed
>>>>>>> behavior is quite deterministic.  I'll go talk to Stuart...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Someone should actually debug the failure.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Evan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Evan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My revert of r97010 didn't work. Evan, 97011 seems the next obvious guess,
>>>>>>> can you take a look?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:45 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Evan, Jim, Bob, anyone have a guess what is going on here? I'm
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> guessing Bob's patch is most likely since it touches an IR pass...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'll probably pull that in a bit if no one replies.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I stashed off a .bc file, but I can't reproduce with it. I'm assuming this
>>>>>>> is most likely a miscompile of llvm stage1? Here is the info:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> smoosh-14:libcpp buildslave$
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/xgcc
>>>>>>> -B/Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/
>>>>>>> -B/Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.install.2/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I. -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include
>>>>>>> -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -g -O2
>>>>>>> -mdynamic-no-pic -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
>>>>>>> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute
>>>>>>> -pedantic -Wno-long-long  -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I.
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -c -o init.o -MT init.o
>>>>>>> -MMD -MP -MF .deps/init.Po ../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/init.c
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Assertion failed: (i < NumOperands && "getOperand() out of range!"),
>>>>>>> function getOperand, file
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm.src/include/llvm/User.h,
>>>>>>> line 104.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/init.c:666: internal compiler error: Abort trap
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please submit a full bug report,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> See <URL:http://llvm.org/bugs/> for instructions.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> smoosh-14:libcpp buildslave$
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/xgcc
>>>>>>> -B/Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/
>>>>>>> -B/Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.install.2/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I. -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include
>>>>>>> -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -g -O2
>>>>>>> -mdynamic-no-pic -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
>>>>>>> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute
>>>>>>> -pedantic -Wno-long-long  -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I.
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -c -o init.o -MT init.o
>>>>>>> -MMD -MP -MF .deps/init.Po ../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/init.c -emit-llvm -o
>>>>>>> /tmp/t.bc
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (gdb) r
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Starting program:
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/prev-gcc/cc1
>>>>>>> -quiet -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I.
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I.
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl
>>>>>>> -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -iprefix
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/prev-gcc/../lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin9/4.2.1/
>>>>>>> -isystem
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/include
>>>>>>> -MMD init.d -MF .deps/init.Po -MP -MT init.o -MQ init.o -D__DYNAMIC__
>>>>>>> -DENABLE_LLVM -DENABLE_LLVM ../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/init.c
>>>>>>> -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols -quiet -dumpbase init.c
>>>>>>> -mmacosx-version-min=10.5.8 -mdynamic-no-pic -auxbase-strip init.o -g -O2 -W
>>>>>>> -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
>>>>>>> -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long
>>>>>>> -o /var/tmp//cc9W2r3q.s
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Reading symbols for shared libraries ++++.. done
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Assertion failed: (i < NumOperands && "getOperand() out of range!"),
>>>>>>> function getOperand, file
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm.src/include/llvm/User.h,
>>>>>>> line 104.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0x90b76b50 in __kill ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (gdb) bt
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #0  0x90b76b50 in __kill ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #1  0x90c11c00 in abort ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #2  0x90c04c10 in __assert_rtn ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #3  0x00ea949c in llvm::InstCombiner::FoldGEPICmp ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #4  0x00eb1260 in llvm::InstCombiner::visitICmpInst ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #5  0x00ee5158 in llvm::InstVisitor<llvm::InstCombiner,
>>>>>>> llvm::Instruction*>::visit ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #6  0x00edf0c8 in llvm::InstCombiner::DoOneIteration ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #7  0x00ed9bc8 in llvm::InstCombiner::runOnFunction ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #8  0x010c5400 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #9  0x00f2a190 in (anonymous namespace)::CGPassManager::runOnModule ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #10 0x010c4f58 in llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #11 0x010c67c0 in llvm::PassManagerImpl::run ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #12 0x010c6894 in llvm::PassManager::run ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #13 0x0087d6f4 in llvm_asm_file_end ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #14 0x0079eeec in compile_file ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #15 0x007a1f18 in do_compile ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #16 0x007a1fe0 in toplev_main ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #17 0x00122ffc in main ()
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> <t.bc>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:48 PM,  <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9 on
>>>>>>> smooshlab.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://smooshlab.apple.com:8010/builders/llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/builds/979
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://smooshlab.apple.com:8010/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: smoosh-14.apple.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Build Reason:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Build Source Stamp: 97012
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Blamelist: bwilson,evancheng,fjahanian,grosbach,johannes
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed test.llvm.stage2 compile.llvm-gcc.stage2
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> sincerely,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -The Buildbot
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ================================================================================
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> CHANGES:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/Makefile
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> SingleSource/UnitTests/Makefile
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:25:31
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Changed By: johannes
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Comments: Disable some tests on PPC Darwin that are never going to work.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Properties:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> lib/Frontend/RewriteObjC.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> test/Rewriter/rewrite-block-pointer.mm
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:30:31
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Changed By: fjahanian
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Comments: Fix rewriting of a method when return type is
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> a block pointer type. Fixes radar 7682149.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Properties:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> File: test/Rewriter/rewrite-block-pointer.mm
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:40:33
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Changed By: fjahanian
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Comments: Correct radar no.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Properties:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> include/llvm/Analysis/PHITransAddr.h
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> lib/Analysis/PHITransAddr.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:40:33
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Changed By: bwilson
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Comments: Add an argument to PHITranslateValue to specify the DominatorTree.
>>>>>>> If this
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> argument is non-null, pass it along to PHITranslateSubExpr so that it can
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> prefer using existing values that dominate the PredBB, instead of just
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> blindly picking the first equivalent value that it finds on a uselist.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also when the DominatorTree is specified, have PHITranslateValue filter
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> out any result that does not dominate the PredBB.  This is basically just
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> refactoring the check that used to be in GetAvailablePHITranslatedSubExpr
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> and also in GVN.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Despite my initial expectations, this change does not affect the results
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> of GVN for any testcases that I could find, but it should help compile time.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Before this change, if PHITranslateSubExpr picked a value that does not
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> dominate, PHITranslateWithInsertion would then insert a new value, which GVN
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> would later determine to be redundant and would replace.  By picking a good
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> value to begin with, we save GVN the extra work of inserting and then
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> replacing a new value.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Properties:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/2010-02-23-DAGCombineBug.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/critical-edge-split.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/ins_subreg_coalesce-3.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/trunc-to-bool.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/xor-icmp.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:45:32
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Changed By: evancheng
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Comments: Re-apply 96540 and 96556 with fixes.Properties:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/Thumb2/ldr-str-imm12.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:45:32
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Changed By: grosbach
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Comments: LowerCall() should always do getCopyFromReg() to reference the
>>>>>>> stack pointer.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Machine instruction selection is much happier when operands are in virtual
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> registers.Properties:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LOGS:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'stdio':
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ********************
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Failing Tests (1):
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendC/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Expected Passes    : 4991
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Expected Failures  : 38
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Unsupported Tests  : 64
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Unexpected Failures: 1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> make[1]: *** [check-local-lit] Error 1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> make: *** [check-lit] Error 2
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'fail':
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendC/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'xfail':
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: LLVMC/MultiplePluginPriorities.td
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: LLVMC/OutputSuffixHook.td
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: MC/AsmParser/directive_lsym.s
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: MC/AsmParser/exprs-invalid.s
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/GVN/rle-no-phi-translate.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/GlobalOpt/2009-03-03-dbg.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/GlobalOpt/2009-03-05-dbg.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/IndVarSimplify/loop_evaluate_6.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/TailCallElim/nocapture.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/TailDup/2008-06-11-AvoidDupLoopHeader.ll
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'unsupported':
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-04-27-bitfield-vs-ivar.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-04-28-bitfield-vs-vbc.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-08-05-utf16.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-08-17-DebugInfo.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-11-30-Objc-ID.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2010-02-01-utf16-with-null.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2010-02-11-fwritable-stringsBug.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2010-02-23-DbgInheritance.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: LLVMC/ObjC++/hello.mm
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LLVM :: LLVMC/ObjC/hello.m
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of '2003-08-23-localuniontest.c':
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Command Output (stderr):
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm.src/test/FrontendC/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c:
>>>>>>> In function 'test':
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm.src/test/FrontendC/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c:9:
>>>>>>> error: redefinition of 'union foo'
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ********************
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'stdio':
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> configure: creating ./config.status
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> config.status: creating Makefile
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> config.status: creating gccbug
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> config.status: creating mklibgcc
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> config.status: creating libada-mk
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> config.status: creating ada/Makefile
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> config.status: creating auto-host.h
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> config.status: executing default commands
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'warnings':
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1781: warning: operand 3
>>>>>>> missing mode?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1794: warning: operand 3
>>>>>>> missing mode?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1807: warning: operand 3
>>>>>>> missing mode?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1882: warning: operand 1
>>>>>>> missing mode?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1889: warning: operand 1
>>>>>>> missing mode?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:2195: warning: destination
>>>>>>> missing a mode?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:2195: warning: operand 0
>>>>>>> missing mode?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/sched-vis.c:628: warning: no previous prototype for
>>>>>>> 'print_insn'
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/libgcc2.c:412: warning: control reaches end of
>>>>>>> non-void function
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/libgcc2.c:2045: warning: 'noreturn' function does
>>>>>>> return
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> llvm-testresults mailing list
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> llvm-testresults mailing list
>>>>>>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> llvm-testresults mailing list
>>>>>>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-testresults mailing list
> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults

More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list