[llvm-testresults] buildbot failure in smooshlab on llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9

Stuart Hastings stuart at apple.com
Wed Feb 24 13:38:23 PST 2010 

On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:

> Just a reminder, this isn't a simple bootstrap, it is failing in the stage2 llm-gcc compile. My guess is the first LLVM-gcc is miscompiling the second stage LLVM. That won't show up in a normal LLVM-gcc bootstrap.

I have an llvmgcc bootstrap of r97011 running right now on smoosh-14.

stuart

> 
> 
> - Daniel
> 
> 
> On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> Well, I can't reproduce on my machine. My ppc machine self-hosted fine last night. I think there is something else going on. Stuart, Dale, can one of you guys reproduce this look at this a bit? Is it llvmCore being miscompiled or llvmgcc42? Please get me a test case if that's possible. Thanks.
>> 
>> Dan, can you audit my patch carefully? Thanks.
>> 
>> Evan
>> 
>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 10:49 AMPST, Bob Wilson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The ppc buildbot just turned green (with 97011 reverted).
>>> 
>>> Yep.  I'm satisfied that was it.  Thanks Daniel.
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 9:34 AMPST, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:47 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I saw this on x86 last night. Then it disappeared. I am moving tomorrow so I can't deal with it. Dale, could you help? Thanks.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ok, I'm going to try another speculative revert of r97011 then.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You are not understanding me. I saw this assertion on x86 the night before. It was well before I commit the patch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You may have, but the x86 buildbots are not failing.  The ppc buildbots (both) are failing consistently, and logs indicate the breakage was between 97006 and 97012.   I suppose it could be nondeterminism but the observed behavior is quite deterministic.  I'll go talk to Stuart...
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Someone should actually debug the failure.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Evan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Evan
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> My revert of r97010 didn't work. Evan, 97011 seems the next obvious guess, can you take a look?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:45 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Evan, Jim, Bob, anyone have a guess what is going on here? I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> guessing Bob's patch is most likely since it touches an IR pass...
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll probably pull that in a bit if no one replies.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I stashed off a .bc file, but I can't reproduce with it. I'm assuming this is most likely a miscompile of llvm stage1? Here is the info:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> smoosh-14:libcpp buildslave$ /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/ -B/Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.install.2/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/  -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I. -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long  -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I. -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -c -o init.o -MT init.o -MMD -MP -MF .deps/init.Po ../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/init.c
>>>>>>>>>> Assertion failed: (i < NumOperands && "getOperand() out of range!"), function getOperand, file /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm.src/include/llvm/User.h, line 104.
>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/init.c:666: internal compiler error: Abort trap
>>>>>>>>>> Please submit a full bug report,
>>>>>>>>>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>>>>>>>>>> See <URL:http://llvm.org/bugs/> for instructions.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> smoosh-14:libcpp buildslave$ /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/ -B/Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.install.2/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/  -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I. -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long  -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I. -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -c -o init.o -MT init.o -MMD -MP -MF .deps/init.Po ../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/init.c -emit-llvm -o /tmp/t.bc
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> (gdb) r
>>>>>>>>>> Starting program: /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/prev-gcc/cc1 -quiet -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I. -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp -I. -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/../include -I./../intl -I../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/include -iprefix /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/prev-gcc/../lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin9/4.2.1/ -isystem /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm-gcc.obj.2/./prev-gcc/include -MMD init.d -MF .deps/init.Po -MP -MT init.o -MQ init.o -D__DYNAMIC__ -DENABLE_LLVM -DENABLE_LLVM ../../llvm-gcc.src/libcpp/init.c -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols -quiet -dumpbase init.c -mmacosx-version-min=10.5.8 -mdynamic-no-pic -auxbase-strip init.o -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -o /var/tmp//cc9W2r3q.s
>>>>>>>>>> Reading symbols for shared libraries ++++.. done
>>>>>>>>>> Assertion failed: (i < NumOperands && "getOperand() out of range!"), function getOperand, file /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm.src/include/llvm/User.h, line 104.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
>>>>>>>>>> 0x90b76b50 in __kill ()
>>>>>>>>>> (gdb) bt
>>>>>>>>>> #0  0x90b76b50 in __kill ()
>>>>>>>>>> #1  0x90c11c00 in abort ()
>>>>>>>>>> #2  0x90c04c10 in __assert_rtn ()
>>>>>>>>>> #3  0x00ea949c in llvm::InstCombiner::FoldGEPICmp ()
>>>>>>>>>> #4  0x00eb1260 in llvm::InstCombiner::visitICmpInst ()
>>>>>>>>>> #5  0x00ee5158 in llvm::InstVisitor<llvm::InstCombiner, llvm::Instruction*>::visit ()
>>>>>>>>>> #6  0x00edf0c8 in llvm::InstCombiner::DoOneIteration ()
>>>>>>>>>> #7  0x00ed9bc8 in llvm::InstCombiner::runOnFunction ()
>>>>>>>>>> #8  0x010c5400 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction ()
>>>>>>>>>> #9  0x00f2a190 in (anonymous namespace)::CGPassManager::runOnModule ()
>>>>>>>>>> #10 0x010c4f58 in llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule ()
>>>>>>>>>> #11 0x010c67c0 in llvm::PassManagerImpl::run ()
>>>>>>>>>> #12 0x010c6894 in llvm::PassManager::run ()
>>>>>>>>>> #13 0x0087d6f4 in llvm_asm_file_end ()
>>>>>>>>>> #14 0x0079eeec in compile_file ()
>>>>>>>>>> #15 0x007a1f18 in do_compile ()
>>>>>>>>>> #16 0x007a1fe0 in toplev_main ()
>>>>>>>>>> #17 0x00122ffc in main ()
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> <t.bc>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> - Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:48 PM,  <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9 on smooshlab.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://smooshlab.apple.com:8010/builders/llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/builds/979
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://smooshlab.apple.com:8010/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: smoosh-14.apple.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Build Reason:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Build Source Stamp: 97012
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blamelist: bwilson,evancheng,fjahanian,grosbach,johannes
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed test.llvm.stage2 compile.llvm-gcc.stage2
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>>> -The Buildbot
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ================================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> CHANGES:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>>>>>>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>>>> SingleSource/UnitTests/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:25:31
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changed By: johannes
>>>>>>>>>>>> Comments: Disable some tests on PPC Darwin that are never going to work.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Properties:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/Frontend/RewriteObjC.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>> test/Rewriter/rewrite-block-pointer.mm
>>>>>>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:30:31
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changed By: fjahanian
>>>>>>>>>>>> Comments: Fix rewriting of a method when return type is
>>>>>>>>>>>> a block pointer type. Fixes radar 7682149.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Properties:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> File: test/Rewriter/rewrite-block-pointer.mm
>>>>>>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:40:33
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changed By: fjahanian
>>>>>>>>>>>> Comments: Correct radar no.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Properties:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>>>>>>> include/llvm/Analysis/PHITransAddr.h
>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/Analysis/PHITransAddr.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:40:33
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changed By: bwilson
>>>>>>>>>>>> Comments: Add an argument to PHITranslateValue to specify the DominatorTree.  If this
>>>>>>>>>>>> argument is non-null, pass it along to PHITranslateSubExpr so that it can
>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer using existing values that dominate the PredBB, instead of just
>>>>>>>>>>>> blindly picking the first equivalent value that it finds on a uselist.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also when the DominatorTree is specified, have PHITranslateValue filter
>>>>>>>>>>>> out any result that does not dominate the PredBB.  This is basically just
>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring the check that used to be in GetAvailablePHITranslatedSubExpr
>>>>>>>>>>>> and also in GVN.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Despite my initial expectations, this change does not affect the results
>>>>>>>>>>>> of GVN for any testcases that I could find, but it should help compile time.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Before this change, if PHITranslateSubExpr picked a value that does not
>>>>>>>>>>>> dominate, PHITranslateWithInsertion would then insert a new value, which GVN
>>>>>>>>>>>> would later determine to be redundant and would replace.  By picking a good
>>>>>>>>>>>> value to begin with, we save GVN the extra work of inserting and then
>>>>>>>>>>>> replacing a new value.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Properties:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/2010-02-23-DAGCombineBug.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/critical-edge-split.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/ins_subreg_coalesce-3.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/trunc-to-bool.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/X86/xor-icmp.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:45:32
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changed By: evancheng
>>>>>>>>>>>> Comments: Re-apply 96540 and 96556 with fixes.Properties:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Files:
>>>>>>>>>>>> lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>> test/CodeGen/Thumb2/ldr-str-imm12.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> At: Tue 23 Feb 2010 17:45:32
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changed By: grosbach
>>>>>>>>>>>> Comments: LowerCall() should always do getCopyFromReg() to reference the stack pointer.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Machine instruction selection is much happier when operands are in virtual
>>>>>>>>>>>> registers.Properties:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOGS:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'stdio':
>>>>>>>>>>>> ********************
>>>>>>>>>>>> Failing Tests (1):
>>>>>>>>>>>>  LLVM :: FrontendC/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Expected Passes    : 4991
>>>>>>>>>>>> Expected Failures  : 38
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unsupported Tests  : 64
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unexpected Failures: 1
>>>>>>>>>>>> make[1]: *** [check-local-lit] Error 1
>>>>>>>>>>>> make: *** [check-lit] Error 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'fail':
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendC/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'xfail':
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: LLVMC/MultiplePluginPriorities.td
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: LLVMC/OutputSuffixHook.td
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: MC/AsmParser/directive_lsym.s
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: MC/AsmParser/exprs-invalid.s
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/GVN/rle-no-phi-translate.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/GlobalOpt/2009-03-03-dbg.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/GlobalOpt/2009-03-05-dbg.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/IndVarSimplify/loop_evaluate_6.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/TailCallElim/nocapture.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: Transforms/TailDup/2008-06-11-AvoidDupLoopHeader.ll
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'unsupported':
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-04-27-bitfield-vs-ivar.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-04-28-bitfield-vs-vbc.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-08-05-utf16.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-08-17-DebugInfo.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2009-11-30-Objc-ID.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2010-02-01-utf16-with-null.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2010-02-11-fwritable-stringsBug.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: FrontendObjC/2010-02-23-DbgInheritance.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: LLVMC/ObjC++/hello.mm
>>>>>>>>>>>> LLVM :: LLVMC/ObjC/hello.m
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of '2003-08-23-localuniontest.c':
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Command Output (stderr):
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm.src/test/FrontendC/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c: In function 'test':
>>>>>>>>>>>> /Users/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/smooshlab/slave/build.llvm-gcc-powerpc-darwin9/llvm.src/test/FrontendC/2003-08-23-LocalUnionTest.c:9: error: redefinition of 'union foo'
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ********************
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'stdio':
>>>>>>>>>>>> configure: creating ./config.status
>>>>>>>>>>>> config.status: creating Makefile
>>>>>>>>>>>> config.status: creating gccbug
>>>>>>>>>>>> config.status: creating mklibgcc
>>>>>>>>>>>> config.status: creating libada-mk
>>>>>>>>>>>> config.status: creating ada/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>>>> config.status: creating auto-host.h
>>>>>>>>>>>> config.status: executing default commands
>>>>>>>>>>>> make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last 10 lines of 'warnings':
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1781: warning: operand 3 missing mode?
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1794: warning: operand 3 missing mode?
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1807: warning: operand 3 missing mode?
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1882: warning: operand 1 missing mode?
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:1889: warning: operand 1 missing mode?
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:2195: warning: destination missing a mode?
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md:2195: warning: operand 0 missing mode?
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/sched-vis.c:628: warning: no previous prototype for 'print_insn'
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/libgcc2.c:412: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../../llvm-gcc.src/gcc/libgcc2.c:2045: warning: 'noreturn' function does return
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> llvm-testresults mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20100224/58aac71b/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list