[llvm-testresults] [release_20] Build using GCC 4.2.0 RC3 on Linuxx86 32 Bit

Aaron Gray angray at beeb.net
Thu May 10 14:25:35 PDT 2007


> On May 10, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> 
>> Release 2.0 GCC 4.2.0 RC3 on Linux x86 32 Bit LLVM 'make check'  
>> test results.
>>
>>       ===  Summary ===
>>
>>     # of expected passes  1987
>>     # of unexpected failures 2
>>     # of expected failures  3
>> Running /usr/src/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/dg.exp ...
>> FAIL: /usr/src/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/bit-intrinsics.ll
>> Failed with signal(SIGSEGV) at line 2
>> while running: lli --force-interpreter=true Output/bit- 
>> intrinsics.ll.tmp.bc
>> lli[0x84717fc]
> 
> hi Aaron, can you run lli  --force-interpreter=true in the debugger  
> and get a stack trace of this failure?

Can you give me better instructions please.
 
>> Running /usr/src/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/dg.exp ...
>> FAIL: /usr/src/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar_promote.ll
>> Failed with exit(1) at line 1
>> while running: llvm-upgrade < /usr/src/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/ 
>> scalar_promote.ll | llvm-as | opt  -licm -stats |  grep {memory  
>> locations promoted to register}
> 
> This is very strange, there should be a |& in the test.  Are you  
> testing Tanya's 2.0 branch, or something else?  You need this patch  
> in your tree:
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of- 
> Mon-20070507/049427.html
> 
> Is that not on the branch?

Yes its the 2.0 branch, do I still need the patch ?

I will do it tommorow now as it is late here.

Aaron




More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list