[llvm-testresults] [release_20] Build using GCC 4.2.0 RC3 on Linuxx86 32 Bit
Aaron Gray
angray at beeb.net
Thu May 10 14:25:35 PDT 2007
> On May 10, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
>> Release 2.0 GCC 4.2.0 RC3 on Linux x86 32 Bit LLVM 'make check'
>> test results.
>>
>> === Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes 1987
>> # of unexpected failures 2
>> # of expected failures 3
>> Running /usr/src/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/dg.exp ...
>> FAIL: /usr/src/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/bit-intrinsics.ll
>> Failed with signal(SIGSEGV) at line 2
>> while running: lli --force-interpreter=true Output/bit-
>> intrinsics.ll.tmp.bc
>> lli[0x84717fc]
>
> hi Aaron, can you run lli --force-interpreter=true in the debugger
> and get a stack trace of this failure?
Can you give me better instructions please.
>> Running /usr/src/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/dg.exp ...
>> FAIL: /usr/src/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar_promote.ll
>> Failed with exit(1) at line 1
>> while running: llvm-upgrade < /usr/src/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/
>> scalar_promote.ll | llvm-as | opt -licm -stats | grep {memory
>> locations promoted to register}
>
> This is very strange, there should be a |& in the test. Are you
> testing Tanya's 2.0 branch, or something else? You need this patch
> in your tree:
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-
> Mon-20070507/049427.html
>
> Is that not on the branch?
Yes its the 2.0 branch, do I still need the patch ?
I will do it tommorow now as it is late here.
Aaron
More information about the llvm-testresults
mailing list