[llvm-dev] [EXTERNAL] Re: Question about -flto behavior

[Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:55 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 3:55 PM Snider, Todd <t-snider at ti.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> David,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the reply. That makes sense.
>>
>>
>>
>> A couple of further thoughts … In the LTO implementation that I am
>> working on, when -flto is specified to the compiler, the compiler embeds
>> the IR in the compiler generated object file. The linker can then read the
>> IR out of the incoming object file if LTO is enabled at link time or just
>> ignore the IR if LTO is disabled at link time.
>>
>
> Fair enough - in that case, I guess you might want your compiler to
> generate both? It could generate x.ll for the LLVM IR and x.s for the
> machine assembly.
>

It seems to me that such a compiler should generate an assembly file that
contains the assembly as well the IR blob in a single file (that can be
piped into the assembler)?


>
>
>>  I would agree that having -S write out the IR content for -flto provides
>> a good way to see what is being fed into the LTO link in a human readable
>> form.
>>
>>
>>
>> For our LTO implementation, the linker can be told to keep the IR that it
>> extracts from the incoming object files. You can then run llvm-dis over the
>> extracted IR to see the .ll version.
>>
>>
>>
>> ~ Todd
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 18, 2021 4:21 PM
>> *To:* Snider, Todd <t-snider at ti.com>
>> *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [llvm-dev] Question about -flto behavior
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah, sounds expected to me - flto produces object files that aren't
>> really object files - instead they're LLVM IR (bitcode) that the linker
>> identifies, then calls back into LLVM to link the IR, optimize on that IR,
>> then produce object code/assembly/whatever).
>>
>> So the "assembly" form of an "object" (really LLVM bitcode) file is LLVM
>> textual IR.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 1:56 PM Snider, Todd via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> When -flto is combined with -S on the clang command line, the output .s
>> file contains IR content instead of target assembly language.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this expected/correct behavior? I was anticipating that the output .s
>> file would contain target assembly code.
>>
>>
>>
>> ~ Todd Snider
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211018/22b8ead4/attachment.html>